A Line Between Offensive and Sensitivity.

By Link the Writer · Aug 16, 2015 · ·
  1. WARNING: BIT OF A LONG, LONG BLOG ENTRY!! Also, I'm not sure it'll flow smoothly because I'm thinking on it as I type along. Enjoy! :D

    Recent discussions about where to draw the line between offensiveness and sensitivity had me thinking on the issue for a few days. So much so that I want to write a blog on it.

    But first thing I'll do is show you a character I made in The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim. There is a reason behind this, I promise.


    upload_2015-8-16_16-19-38.png
    This is the character I play in Skyrim, a blind assassin/mage with a chip on her shoulder. Marie Motierre. She may, or may not be my fantasy protagonist Mishu Jerni if she were alive and living in Skyrim...

    upload_2015-8-16_16-17-19.png
    This is her in prison, reanimating a corpse. She doesn't even give the dead the rest they deserve. They are her puppets.

    upload_2015-8-16_16-18-40.png
    Then she proceeds to murder a witness during her escape attempt. She's a killer who fights for her own survival and cares for nothing but herself and the close few friends she has. Everyone else is a potential enemy. Though Mishu isn't this bad, nor does she reanimate corpses. :p She would be horrified at Marie's actions and work to stop her at any cost.

    I know, what has this got to do with the subject? How the hell does roleplaying a blind assassin have anything to do with being offended?

    Well, people get offended over the most minor thing. There are Zelda fans in a forum I'm on that got offended because Link was now right-handed. There are Fallout fans in the Bethesda forums that raised a huge stink over the fact that Bethesda once again made the face of Fallout 4 some middle-class white dude who is married to a woman and has a child. I looked at posts where people told the opposition to shut up and stop being so sensitive; that Bethesda shouldn't listen to them.

    So...could someone be offended that I'm roleplaying this character? Possibly. There's a trope on TV Tropes called 'Evil Albino'. Marie doesn't have albinism, but suffice to say, it's common in TV land apparently to depict a character with albinism as some creepy/evil person. To some with albinism, this could be offensive because the implication is 'all albinos are evil/creepy'. Or someone with visual problems might think my character is offensive. Especially since she reanimates dead bodies to fight for her.

    As I recalled all the 'stop being so sensitive!' comments on the Bethesda forums, I wondered why the offended party felt...well...offended. I read their posts and they kept mentioning how they wanted to feel represented. I wondered what was the core reasoning behind it. Then reading the threads here provided me with a possible answer. "Trigger".

    Basically, when a person is so sensitive to a particular subject, there are triggers that kicks the emotions to high gear. They freak, they start losing it. In short, they're offended. Why? Well, I'm not going to speak for all of them, because no offended person is alike. What I can do is talk about one such possible reason. Bullying. If someone who was different from the mainstream kept being told by the media that they aren't worthy to be heroes, they're not worthy to have a badass who looks just like them, they're more sensitive to it than those who weren't told this. If a kid with albinism was picked on in school, being called a freak, etc., the kid would be much more sensitive to a movie/book/whatever depicting a person with albinism as creepy/disturbing/evil/not normal. It's the same with characters with mental disorders being portrayed as crazy psychos, or a black character being killed off five seconds into a movie. To the person with that trigger, it's basically saying, "You are not worth it. You don't get to be a hero. You're just a freak/not a hero." From that kid's POV, what does Marie symbolize? She's not the badass blind mage that defends Skyrim from the evil Alduin and works to secure peace and justice for all. She's this creepy, messed up piece of work! And from that the child is a creepy, messed up piece of work simply for being what he/she is!

    What I think the "omg stop being an overly-sensitive twat!" people in the Bethesda forum were missing was the one big, irradiated, neon-red fact. They get to be offended. They have emotions just like anyone else. Their opinions get to be heard, get to be considered. What may not be such a big deal for us is a mental and an emotional hellfire to them. Telling them to shut up and sit down is, to them, the world once again telling them that they don't matter. Their opinions don't matter. What they say is so worthless that not even roaches will touch it.

    Conversely, though: what they (the "omg stop being an overly-sensitive twat!" folks) likely were trying to say is that not every little thing is an attack on them. Bethesda making their default character a white guy doesn't automatically mean they're horrible sexists pigs who are also racists. Me having a deranged blind assassin doesn't mean I think all people with visual impairments are crazy/creepy/dangerous. Marie is this way simply because that's how I envisioned her. If I had wanted her to be an honorable person, a student at the College and adopted daughter of Jarl Baalgruf of Whiterun, then that's what she would've been. Instead I roleplayed that she was raised by the evil Grelod, matron of Riften's Honorhall Orphanage. Years of verbal, physical, and emotional abuse had made Marie the way she is.

    Basically, both parties have a point.

    So when is a line crossed? When both parties refuse to consider the other side's opinion. "Gee, maybe we can stand to make trailers where the protagonist isn't an average white dude." or "Gee, maybe I did make too much of an issue about it. This isn't an attack on me as a human being." Both parties are so entrenched in their own (entitled by right) opinions that the opposition is wrong on so many levels.

    Both sides have valid reasons to have their opinion, and both need to be considered.

    EDIT: And just because I feel the need to do so, that was the 'old' Marie. The new one I'm roleplaying?
    upload_2015-8-16_17-35-51.png
    Jarl Baalgruf of Whiterun with his adopted daughter, Marie Motierre.
    Oscar Leigh and Hubardo like this.

Comments

  1. Hubardo
    There's a phrase "intentions vs impact." Usually when there are two parties in these situations one says "my intentions were good therefore stfu." The other says "the impact was harmful so your intentions are irrelevant." An offender can always say their intentions were good; on the extreme end of things a wife batterer will always frame the beatings as "good for her" and "what she deserved." Hence, his intentions were to correct what he believes were genuinely punishment-deserving beatings.

    Cultural appropriation is one of those issues. I know of many American Indians who take offense to white girls at music festivals who have taken to this trend of wearing headdresses. Apparently headdresses have a pretty big cultural meaning behind them and the idea is that these white girls are removing a sacred object out of context and using it as art or personal expression when it is not really "theirs" to begin with. It's controversial because it gets into the "can you own an expression of fashion statement" kind of thing. But imagine you're walking through an African American neighborhood and you're a white person wearing an afro wig. In theory, if we really pretend like the intellectual realm is all that exists, and ideas and people and emotions can actually be separated, who cares. It's a wig. Hair doesn't matter. But it might matter to black folks who think you're turning the way their hair actually grows to be some thing you can remove from their shared cultural and historical experiences, which include oppression that a white person typically cannot understand from personal experience.

    The other thing is intergenerational trauma, which is a pretty real thing. We find that people who experience collective trauma, such as descendants of slaves, people in countries where there has been war in recent history, have mass PTSD-types of symptoms across their culture. Telling a trauma victim to get over it, to stop being so sensitive, impedes their healing process. A rape joke can make a rape survivor go into freeze mode, dissociating and wanting to flee from reality. Not every rape survivor, but it's not uncommon. Ideally everybody would have thick skin, heal quickly, get over it, so we can all just get along and take things lightly.

    But I have the bias of being a new mental health professional. I like to believe that people should be handled with care, and even of their sensitivity seems too much or even a cry for help/attention, that there's something of value in what they're saying. It doesn't mean you give traumatized people 100% control of the internet, how people dress, TV language regulations or whatever else. But I think it's important to take them at least somewhat seriously. To dismiss them entirely seems unnecessarily mean.

    I've rolled my eyes at people talking about what is offensive, and I still do. But I guess it's like me wanting to be a bigger person and step outside of what I believe to be people just being idiots or assholes. That's a challenge.

    I'll close with this article which is somewhat relevant although not entirely: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-new-brain/201010/sticks-and-stones-hurtful-words-damage-the-brain

    Thanks for posting. Always a good issue to explore from any angle.
      Link the Writer likes this.
  2. Link the Writer
    Exactly. The suffering is very real for the person who was the victim of that trauma. So when they see someone outside their group using something that's real to them, that's a part of them as some sort of commodity, I can see how they'll be offended.

    In my case, I have visual impairment so whenever I play Marie Motierre (both versions), I'm reminded by the stark reality: the blindness is just a cosmetic as far as the game is concerned. No one looks at her and says, “Woah, what happened to your eyes?” or asks her how she's able to move around or read books. When she does, I have to imagine that she's reading it in their version of Braille and the printed version is for me.
    Granted this isn't as big as a white dude wearing an afro, or a white girl wearing a Native American headdress pretending to be Native American, but in my mind, the same basic principle applies. Blindness is a real thing, it's not something that's just a cosmetic design or to make the person look cool. It's a real disability. If Marie were living in our world, she'd be using a cane/guide dog and reading Braille. She'd have to put up with people who think she's helpless because she's blind, or grab her arm and haul her across the street under the pretext of 'helping her' without her permission. She'd have to put up with insensitive twats asking her how many fingers they're holding up, or saying things like, “Aww, that's so sad. You don't know what your momma looks like.” That's why in my fantasy, I hope to correct this by showing how blindness has an impact on Mishu. It's not all she is, but it's a huge part of who she is. She's blind; she can't see anything. Not even magic can replace her sight. It's helped her a little, but she would still need a cane and their version of our Braille. She'll also have to put up with people who think she's helpless, or a burden, or a beacon of inspiration*. She'll have to put up with people who think they're helping her by dragging her across the street, etc.

    * This is a sore subject for all disabled people. Being treated as the stereotypical ‘inspirationally disabled’, rather than people who just happen to have a disability. This stereotype makes the disability all that they are.

    Basically, to the white, sighted person, all of this is no big deal. To a blind and/or non-white person, it's a frickin' huge deal when others treat what they consider a part of who they are as just a cool little gimmick or a commodity.
      Hubardo likes this.
  3. TheApprentice
    I wouldn't be too concerned if people are offended by your story. Haterz gonna hate.

    That being said, though, I was kind of hoping to play a Fallout protag with no family kind of like Fallout New Vegas. I have no desire for a wife or kids so I won't feel as connected to the protag in Fallout 4 when I do finally play it.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice