1. Published on Amazon? If you have a book, e-book, or audiobook available on Amazon.com, we'll promote it on WritingForums.org for free. Simply add your book to our Member Publications section. Add your book here or read the full announcement.
    Dismiss Notice

On the "cut mercilessly" rule of writing.

Published by DaWalrus in the blog DaWalrus's blog. Views: 72

In this thread originally posted by CrazyIvan, one of the replies mentions the good old "cut-to-the-bone" principle.

Reviewing my own opus in progress, I've pondered how exactly to understand that guideline. Should anything non-essential be deleted? Definitely not. How about redundant or irrelevant? Definitely yes.

A few thoughts here.

First, the porter in Macbeth. (Who's there, i' th' name of Beelzebub?). Hold on to your rotten tomatoes, I am not suggesting to edit him out, just to improve upon the classic. But even without it, would not we still have a masterpiece of a play on our hands?

On the other hand, I have enountered a specific situation, when removing an appealing piece was called for. I had three sentences: A, B, and C.

'A' presented an initial idea. Both B and C improved upon it, though they were redundant. Both appeared witty, and the choice was a bit painful. But a choice it was. Stuffing in anything that appears original, relevant and clever results in amateurish-looking clutter.

I also have a chapter which is essential to the plot, although I really hate it. So, I intend to condense it to a paragraph.

I guess, I would rephrase the rule as:

Without mercy, but with judgement, cut and condense.
  • Cogito
  • DaWalrus
You need to be logged in to comment