Asking for input: your most common style 'gripes'

Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by Tea@3, Jul 24, 2016.

  1. ChickenFreak

    ChickenFreak Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    13,084
    Yes, but the singular "they" has a long, long history. And Googling

    singular they themselves

    leads me to a conclusion that the singular "themselves" is what's most often used with the singular "they".
     
  2. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    However, to stay on the gender-neutral side, and still have correct agreement between the words, you can reconfigure the sentence like so:

    It's filler. (Watch the comma splice!:)) It's condescending (as if the writer thinks the readers can't figure things out for themselves.)
     
    BayView and Iain Aschendale like this.
  3. Sifunkle

    Sifunkle Dis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    586
    @ChickenFreak - Googling that didn't lead me to any conclusion of that ilk, although I'd probably err towards grammatical logic than herd mentality anyway, given that the whole issue is without standard. (On that front, if/when I'm Supreme Utilitarian Ruler, I'll be revising the standards: don't get too attached to the letter C).

    @jannert - In the original quote that comma wasn't a splice; it was separating items in a list (ETA: that was the intent anyway. I suppose a clear list wouldn't have repeated the subject...). But I agree that rewriting to avoid the issue is generally best. (There's probably also a joke in there about writers doing what I was railing against never having more than one reader.)

    So, back on track... non-standard English is a style no-no for you @BayView +/- others? Doesn't bother me in the slightest when reading, although as a writer I'd probably save it for dialogue and forum posts rather than narratives or formal writing. Although that googling did reveal that publishers in my country find singular they perfectly acceptable...
     
    jannert likes this.
  4. ChickenFreak

    ChickenFreak Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    13,084
    I don't know that I'd agree that it's without standard. Historically, I'd say that the standard was the singular their/themselves. A link, from a different Googling:

    http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/austheir.html
     
  5. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    If you're writing a piece of fiction, you can actually adopt any style you want. Whatever fits best, is probably your best choice.

    If you choose to use a comma splice in this instance because it reads well, and speed is what you want to achieve (a full stop, or 'period,' slows it down just a tiny fraction more than a comma does) then by all means use your comma. However, subject and verb together does create a complete sentence, so be aware that separating several of these constructions with commas is breaking the rule. If you want to be totally correct, use semicolons in your list instead and you'll be fine. Semicolons are correct in lists, and also between complete sentences if you want the two to be strongly connected.

    Break the rule if you think it works, but do be aware—as you seem to be—you're doing exactly that. (Which is why I included the smiley! :))
     
    Last edited: Jul 30, 2016
  6. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    I am very fond of the book Writers’ Devils: The Grammar Guide for Fiction Writers, by Dan Persinger, and I refer to it often. Here is a quote from near the start of the book that sums up the author’s attitude:

    “You should observe the conventions of the language unless you have a reason not to—there is no point in using non-standard punctuation toward no literary purpose whatsoever. You wouldn’t make a run-on sentence or a comma splice or omit the quotation marks in dialogue unless you had some perceived good reason, would you? When you write with nonstandard punctuation for no discernible good reason at all, editors and readers are left to infer that you’re using it for the only remaining reason: that you just don’t know any better.

    “With that said, I’m not going to even try to tell you to do something the ‘right’ way every time according to some punctuation rule as if you were writing an academic research paper or a refrigerator manual. (Would that refrigerator manuals were so carefully written!-Jannert) In your trade of fiction writing, you might not always use standard punctuation—in fact you might use hardly any punctuation at all if it doesn’t fit your creative plan (Cormac McCarthy, anyone?). However, you do need to know what some standard applications of punctuation are in fiction so that when you depart from them in your writing you’ll know it. You’ll understand what you’ve done and why you’ve done it.”

    Dan Persinger's attitude is similar to grammatical issues, such as the gender pronoun problem discussed here on this thread. Do what works in a purposeful way, but stick to conventional usage unless there is a good reason to depart from it. I'm a fan of that approach.
     
    minstrel likes this.
  7. Sifunkle

    Sifunkle Dis Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    Messages:
    478
    Likes Received:
    586
    @ChickenFreak - Although even more historically, their/themself was the standard, says Wikipedia (referenced), while also suggesting that themself is on the rise and including it in their table as the reflexive pronoun for singular they. Plus a million other links I can find... I'm not convinced there's a standard. I suppose the grammatical argument against themself is that the verbs used with singular they are usually plural (when there's a difference). E.g. 'When I call a plumber, they usually unclogs my drain by themself' matches plurality across the board, but I don't think anyone goes with that.

    @jannert - No question there, but did that strictly break a rule? Commas are used to separate items on a list, and you can have a list of complete sentences ('Susie likes pizza, Billy likes hamburgers and Maisy likes hot dogs.'). I've never considered the twilight zone between lists and comma splices before... just pedantically interested now. I was happy with how I phrased it regardless of technical right or wrong, although it would be nice to know (as you say). Ditto on the singular they reflexives, although I don't see a solid answer there any time soon.

    I must seem like a wanker who can't admit fault :( but I don't want to be a leaf blowing in the wind either.
     
    jannert likes this.
  8. matwoolf

    matwoolf Banned Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    10,135
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    No Simon, you are my snowflake - buffets upon window pane, Christmas morning, soft landing, but lo, more flakes descend on you, my pillow, and you - crushed in a winter tragedy; melt waters are all together.
     
    jannert and 123456789 like this.
  9. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Well, I think you're fine, actually. I wouldn't worry, especially if it is actually a list. I was making a pedantic joke ...hence the smiley. Here's what a really pedantic writer would probably do: Susie likes pizza; Billy likes hamburgers; Maisy likes hot dogs.

    The comma splice issue is more a concern with more complicated sentences, just research anything you're not sure of, then you can move ahead with confidence. (See what I just did? :))
     
  10. 123456789

    123456789 Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,102
    Likes Received:
    4,605
    I cannot stand common descriptions, actions, and dialogue, written by a common writer (eg, not Hemingway). The laughs, the smirks, the tucking under of the legs, and the trite quips, these things, unless placed under some grand context-cynical or otherwise-are revealing of a dull mind.
     
  11. matwoolf

    matwoolf Banned Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    10,135
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    nice one, boss
     
    123456789 likes this.
  12. Mumble Bee

    Mumble Bee Keep writing. Contributor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    The politically correct term is 'smooth' mind.
     
    123456789 likes this.
  13. 123456789

    123456789 Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,102
    Likes Received:
    4,605
    I think this country is sick and tired of being politically correct.
     
  14. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    "This country"?

    I think the world is sick and tired of Americans casually assuming that the internet is exclusively American.
     
  15. Iain Aschendale

    Iain Aschendale Lying, dog-faced pony Marine Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2015
    Messages:
    18,851
    Likes Received:
    35,471
    Location:
    Face down in the dirt
    Currently Reading::
    Telemachus Sneezed
    Other than the furriners, it is, isn’t it? :)
     
  16. Tea@3

    Tea@3 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    306
    Location:
    USA
    I guess she didn't. ;)
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2016
  17. 123456789

    123456789 Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    8,102
    Likes Received:
    4,605
    You do realize you're referring to a conversation between myself, an American, and another American. So if you're not an American, why don't you Canadian yourself out of here? :)
     
    matwoolf likes this.
  18. matwoolf

    matwoolf Banned Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2012
    Messages:
    6,631
    Likes Received:
    10,135
    Location:
    Yorkshire
    'Go, sick balls, get him.'
     
  19. ChickenFreak

    ChickenFreak Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    13,084
    I can't tell if you're serious. You have noticed that this forum, and even this thread, has more people on it than you and whoever those other two people are, right?

    I'm going to assume that you were completely joking in your post above.
     
    BayView likes this.
  20. Earp

    Earp Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,507
    Likes Received:
    8,247
    Location:
    Just right of center.
    But it eventually leads to this sort of nonsense:

    http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Man-Legally-Changes-Name-To-They-2692203.php

    The singular 'they' is always wrong, as are 'comma splices' flow or no.
     
  21. izzybot

    izzybot (unspecified) Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    3,884
    Location:
    SC, USA
    The proper use of singular they results in some asshat changing his name to 'They' for humor to address the common reference to "they."? What? Bit of a leap.
     
    Tea@3 and Sifunkle like this.
  22. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    But this is silly enough to be irrelevant. Don't forget that Prince changed his name to some unpronounceable splot, and was referred to in the music press as "the artist formerly known as Prince." It didn't last, but it was still silly and it didn't result in a ton of people changing their names to unpronounceable splots.
     
    Catrin Lewis likes this.
  23. ChickenFreak

    ChickenFreak Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    13,084
    Feel free to travel back a century or three and tell all of the people who were using it. If you prefer the newfangled rules, that's fine, but new isn't always better.
     
  24. Earp

    Earp Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2016
    Messages:
    4,507
    Likes Received:
    8,247
    Location:
    Just right of center.
    I had a lengthy reply all typed out when this piece of garbage browser (FF) crashed again, so I'll just say I live and write in 2016 and take some pride in being able to do so while observing today's SPAG conventions. I believe my readers will appreciate the effort. and it's the readers that fiction is supposed to be about.
     
    Iain Aschendale likes this.
  25. izzybot

    izzybot (unspecified) Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    3,884
    Location:
    SC, USA
    I mean, you say that, but today's SPAG conventions unarguably include using singular they.

    No one can make you use it, and I'm certainly not going to waste my time trying to talk you into it, but citing publicity stunts and 'today's conventions' (on a matter that's obviously divisive) isn't a strong argument. If you don't want to use singular they because you don't like it, you can just say you don't like it.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice