1. victo

    victo Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    2

    BrE Punctuation...logical punctuation

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by victo, Jun 20, 2015.

    Am I correct on both counts below in your opinion?

    'I', he said, 'am frustrated.'

    The comma goes outside the introductory quote (I',) because the original sentence reads 'I am frustrated', not 'I, am frustrated'.

    But:

    'I am frustrated,' he said, 'but I'll get over it.'

    The comma goes inside the introductory quote ('I am frustrated,') because it is needed to separate two independent clauses separated by a coordinating conjunction. The original sentence is 'I am frustrated, but I'll get over it.'

    Thank you.
     
  2. The Mad Regent

    The Mad Regent Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    419
    Location:
    Wirral, England
    Comma goes inside the speed marks, even when followed up by, he said.
    'I,' he said, 'am frustrated.'

    'I am frustrated,' he said, 'but I'll get over it.'

    This sentence is fine as far as I can tell.
     
    Wreybies likes this.
  3. Wreybies

    Wreybies Thrice Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,826
    Likes Received:
    20,815
    Location:
    El Tembloroso Caribe
    And the reason @The Mad Regent is correct is because the comma is present in both sentences, quotation marks or no. The important thing to remember about quotation marks when they are used to denote dialogue is that they are NOT clause boundaries. They only serve to show which part of a sentence is spoken and which part isn't. The attribution (dialogue tag) is an integral part of the sentence, when written with one, not a separate entity. It's only separate if written as a beat, and for it to be a beat it needs to be a complete sentence.

    'I,' he said, 'am frustrated.'

    is syntactically the same as:

    I, he thought, am frustrated.
     
  4. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    Also be aware in the US those would be double quotes, not single. In the EU I take it single quotes for speech are common, but I think here, it would be a tad disconcerting to some readers.

    Or I'm getting old and inflexible. :(

    And I don't know what BrE stands for. Now I have to go look that up.

    Edited to add, "Oh, OK, now the single quotes make more sense." :)
     
  5. victo

    victo Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    2
    I just found this in The Economist Style Guide:

    When a quotation is broken off and resumed after such words as 'he said', ask yourself whether it would naturally have had any punctuation at the point where it is broken off. If the answer is 'yes', a comma is placed within the quotation marks to represent this. Thus, “If you'll let me see you home,” he said, “I think I know where we can find a cab.” The comma after home belongs to the quotation and so comes within the inverted commas, as does the final full stop.

    But if the words to be quoted are continuous, without punctuation at the point where they are broken, the comma should be outside the inverted commas. Thus, “My bicycle”, she assured him, “awaits me.”

    Hence,

    "I", he said, "am frustrated."

    is correct, then.
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2015
    GingerCoffee likes this.
  6. Wreybies

    Wreybies Thrice Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,826
    Likes Received:
    20,815
    Location:
    El Tembloroso Caribe
    I disagree with the opinion of that style guide. I myself would not follow that advice. But that's me. This style rule they would impose compromises the logical concept of clause boundary, and in an isolating language, if you give up the strictness of clause boundaries then you give up the underpinning logic that makes the whole machine work.
     
    Komposten likes this.
  7. victo

    victo Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    2
    Fair enough.

    Thanks.
     
  8. The Mad Regent

    The Mad Regent Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2015
    Messages:
    1,011
    Likes Received:
    419
    Location:
    Wirral, England
    Is it the same style throughout the whole article? If not then it might just be a typo. :)
     
  9. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    Is this the guide: The Economist Style Guide and if so, what page are you looking at?
     
  10. victo

    victo Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    2
  11. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    From my above link page 117:
    This example on the following page is a different circumstance from interrupted dialogue.
    It's followed by this example which is specific to interrupted dialogue:
     
  12. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    Interesting. I wonder if the author is making an error there. It's possible. I can see the comma does break the sentence in my example regardless of the tag inserted in between. And this follows:
    So it is consistent with your link as well.

    I do believe you have a point. :agreed:
     
  13. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    It begs another question though, if you are interrupting a sentence with the tag, it feels like a natural pause in the dialogue and thus the comma would belong to the dialogue. At least it sounds that way to my ear. Perhaps one shouldn't put the tag in the middle of a spoken sentence at a place it does not normally pause.

    Though I can see this is a circular argument.

    When you interrupt the sentence with the tag, the tag serves as a pause for emphasis. So if you didn't insert the tag and you wanted the pause for emphasis, what punctuation would go there? An ellipses I would think.

    “My bicycle ... awaits me.”
    “My bicycle ..."
    she said, "awaits me.”
    Interrupting the sentence with the tag could be said to create the need for the dialogue to own the comma.

    And around and around we go.

    Nice brain exercise anyway. :)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice