Okay, so I wrote this paper wherein I drew a conclusion which I think was (heavily?) influenced by a book I wasn't allowed to cite for the paper. I think that the same conclusion could have been drawn from a source I was allowed to use, but at the same time I think I expressed it differently from both sources, though I did borrow the idea of "pseudo-monasticism" from the book I wasn't allowed to cite. However, I don't think I used the author's words or constructions that I could have only gotten from him. Does this seem like plagiarism? Thanks!