1. Brandon P.

    Brandon P. Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    California

    Learning new languages without classes

    Discussion in 'Research' started by Brandon P., May 23, 2011.

    A lot of the story ideas I've cooked have involved people from very different cultures meeting each other, but what has always stumped me is the part where these people have to learn each other's language. The major problem is that these ideas invariably take place in settings where simple language classes don't exist. How exactly did people learn new languages before the invention of language classes in school? Is it even possible to learn a new language if you've never encountered its associated culture before?
     
  2. Trish

    Trish Damned if I do and damned if I don't Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Likes Received:
    2,083
    Location:
    New York
    Yes. Just off the top of my head have you never heard of Helen Keller? or even Dances With Wolves?
     
  3. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Languages are most often learned (outside of formal classes) by immersion in the culture. You pick up the essential words and phrases first, and gradually pick up more by listening to and interacting with native speakers.
     
  4. Anonym

    Anonym New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    292
    Likes Received:
    10
    Words are symbols; their meaning agreed upon and mutually understood by those who share them. I can point to an apple and say, "Apple." The other person, knowing what I am referring to, can point to the same object and say, "Manzana." Which I then know is the word for that object, in their language.

    A simplistic example, but that's often how it starts in informal exchanges of words/language - with objects. At least in my personal experience.

    Much of history is filled with peoples coming into contact with people of other languages, and sharing/assimilating languages. Vernacular, for instance? Formal classes are a relatively recent/novel accomodation.
     
  5. Ellipse

    Ellipse Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Messages:
    713
    Likes Received:
    35
    I agree with Cogito. Immersion is the most effective way to learn a language. It is how you learned to speak as a child. At that point in life, you never encountered a culture before.

    How do you think people a thousand years ago learned the languages of a foreign countries? It was along the same principle.
     
  6. Gannon

    Gannon Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2007
    Messages:
    3,975
    Likes Received:
    55
    Location:
    Manchester, England
    Following on from Anonym's response, what would usually be first established is a simple trade pidgeon language where essential terms are learnt in the point and repeat manner described. In this pidgeon it is likely the dominant language would account for most of the terms, and that inflection and derivations would go out the window. With longer exposure the gaps would be filled in, and with total immersion (and providing the learner is physically capable of making the required sounds) fluency would follow in all but the very stubborn and/or language-deficient.
     
  7. James Scarborough

    James Scarborough New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    77
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    San Jose, Costa Rica (Central America)
    I'd also add that, as a writer, you probably don't need to go into much detail about how your characters learn other languages, unless the learning process itself is part of the story. It's very common for people to speak more than one language. Your readers probably don't care how they learned them and don't need to be told.
     
  8. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    ditto all of that... especially james' observation!
     
  9. Porcupine

    Porcupine Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Mostly, they didn't. 2000 years ago, you could find many Romans who spoke Greek (learnt it as school) but hardly a Roman who could speak Proto-Germanic. No classes available, sorry.

    I consider myself personally to be reasonably talented concerning languages. I learnt two in the immersion environment described (but had classes in them as well, of course), and four others in classes with some immersion added to varying degrees. I find learning a language outside of a language class, before my language proficiency level is high enough to be self-sustaining, incredibly hard. That is, using CDs, textbooks, tapes, what have you, only, instead of a capable teacher and a set curriculum. However, some people can learn languages in this way.
     
  10. cruciFICTION

    cruciFICTION Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    *Makes horns with fingers* "Buffalo."
    Dances with Wolves is a very good example there.
     
  11. bluetiger1941

    bluetiger1941 New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Asheville, NC
    Michael Crichton faced that situation in "Eaters of the Death" (made into the movie titled, "The Thirteenth Warrior"). A tenth century Arab traveled with a group of Vikings. As I recall one of the Vikings had a little knowledge of Latin which facilitated communications.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice