Tags:
  1. dillseed

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19

    Narrative vs. dialogue

    Discussion in 'Dialogue Development' started by dillseed, Apr 19, 2014.

    In a narrative we can use numbers, correct? But in dialogue we must spell out every number, right?

    Thanks.

    Ds
     
  2. EdFromNY

    EdFromNY Hope to improve with age Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes Received:
    3,203
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    This is a question for @mammamaia.

    I think the exception might be a year: "I remember 1980 like it was yesterday" rather than "I remember nineteen eighty like it was yesterday".
     
  3. dillseed

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19
    Thanks, Ed.
     
  4. dillseed

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19
    I'm told that we never use numbers for dialogue, because we speak in words, not numbers.
     
  5. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    you're right, dillseed...

    however, using numerals in narrative makes little to no sense, either... check out any dozen novels by generally respected authors and see if it's ever done...
     
  6. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Unfortunately, it. I crin ge when I see it, but face it: the industry is relaxing its standards, at least in some areas.

    Until, of course, you try to sell your own MS with those kinds of mistakes. :D
     
  7. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Just kibbutzing here ...but it seems if the number is large enough, it would make sense to present it as numerals (figures) rather than words.

    If you say your vase broke into eleven pieces, that seems to work fine. But if you say your box contains four thousand, six hundred, and eighty-three marbles, it might be more sensible to say your box holds 4,683 marbles? It's an instantly recognisable number, while the written-out version takes a bit of work.

    The Webster's Compact Writers Guide (1987 edition) says there are two basic conventions for writing numbers:

    One - A writer uses figures for exact numbers greater than 9 (or 10), and words for lesser numbers.

    Two - A writer uses figures for all exact numbers 100 and above, and words for numbers from one to ninety-nine.

    In both cases, it's okay to use a figure followed by the word hundred, thousand, million, etc.
     
    The Despondent Mind likes this.
  8. thirdwind

    thirdwind Member Contest Administrator Reviewer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,851
    Likes Received:
    3,339
    Location:
    Boston
    @jannert, such rules and conventions apply mostly to nonfiction. I remember learning about that rule you posted. Students were told over and over again to use words for anything below ten and to use numbers for everything else.

    I remember asking my teacher what we should do for negative numbers. She told me to quit being a smartass. :(
     
  9. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    In fiction, I write out every number in words, because I want to know how to say it when I read it aloud. This even applies to years - I need to know that 2014, at least in one character's head, is read as twenty fourteen as opposed to two thousand fourteen (which is how another character might think of it).
     
  10. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    There isn't any reference at all in the Websters' that is specifically directed at fiction—which makes me think you can probably do what you like in this regard, as long as you're consistent and it reads well.

    They do make the distinction between legal and scientific/technical writing, though. Legal documents require most numbers to be written out as words, while scientific/technical writing requires the opposite, that numbers should always be presented as figures.

    Just curious. Have you managed to quit being a smartass? :confused:
     
  11. Andrae Smith

    Andrae Smith Bestselling Author|Editor|Writing Coach Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,640
    Likes Received:
    1,668
    Location:
    Washington State, U.S.A.
    I like this. It seems like a clever detail. My only concern would be that readers who aren't careful or forget about the change in pov might mistake it for you being sloppy or inconsistent. Then again, I'm sure the rest of your writing is so tight no one would notice or be bothered.

    To the OP: I think this a good question. @jannert did a fair job breaking down the rule, but as @thirdwind aptly pointed out, it works a bit differently in fiction. I'd say stick with words. I'll have to remember that myself, although it shouldn't be hard.
     
  12. thirdwind

    thirdwind Member Contest Administrator Reviewer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,851
    Likes Received:
    3,339
    Location:
    Boston
    Perhaps. I know that some publishers have in-house rules that they like to follow. I tend to write everything out because, as minstrel pointed out, the reader knows exactly how to pronounce it.

    No I have not.
     
  13. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Good! Everybody likes one. They even get paid, if they're funny enough. :)

    I still think big numbers, like 91, 547, register better if they're written as figures rather than written-out words: ninety-one thousand, five hundred forty seven. Whether it's fiction or not.

    However, in dialogue, because the numbers are spoken out loud, I would certainly always write them as words.

    Unless your publisher has a style they insist you adhere to, I'd say do whatever you want, though. It's your fiction!

    ..........

    Just checked out Strunk & White. They don't have a lot to say on the subject, but their book does deal with fiction as well as non-fiction writing.

    They say: Numerals - do not spell out dates or other serial numbers. Write them in figures or in Roman notation, as appropriate.
    August 9, 1988
    Rule 3
    Part XII
    352d Infantry

    Exception: When they occur in dialogue, most dates and numbers are best spelled out.

    "I arrived home on August ninth."
    "In the year 1990, I turned twenty-one."
    "Read Chapter Twelve."
    ...................................

    So ...is there a definitive answer for the fiction writer? I suspect not.
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2014
    T.Trian and Andrae Smith like this.
  14. dillseed

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19
    So does everyone concur with my other post (“Numbers in quoted dialogue”)? I think that all examples listed are correct, then, with respect to the spelled-out numbers in quoted dialogue.

    Thanks again.
     
  15. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Just had another thought. What if we're barking up the wrong tree here? What if it's not the size of the number that matters, but the number of words it takes to say it?

    Example, @minstrel 's 2014 date. Written out, it's twenty fourteen. Not hard to say or visualise. However, if the date is 2154, you'd have to write twenty-one fifty-four, which isn't quite as smooth. Or if it's a number, not a date? Ten thousand is easy to write and visualise as words ...but ten thousand six hundred and forty two?

    Hmmm... worth thinking about? Since there doesn't seem to be a hard and fast rule?
     
    Andrae Smith likes this.
  16. KaTrian

    KaTrian A foolish little beast. Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    5,393
    Location:
    Funland
    Is it okay to use common sense? (I know it doesn't always apply when editorial questions come up).

    "At one glance, he was able to tell the number of seeds on the floor. Fifty-four thousand four hundred and twenty-seven."

    Or

    "At one glance, he was able to tell the number of seeds on the floor. on the floor. 54,427."

    I don't know, I can personally process the latter better, and while I'm no editor, I think I'd give it a pass in narration, but if the rule of thumb were that no numerals in dialogue, I think I'd just have to avoid unwieldy numbers in dialogue :eek:
     
  17. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    Yeah, there are some exceptions to my personal rule above. I wouldn't spell out ridiculous numbers. John Banville's Kepler has the number 0.00429 right there on page one. I'd let it stand. ;)

    But I'm an engineer, and I'd usually just approximate numbers. If the number is actually 76,845,323 for example, I'd just say seventy-seven million. :p
     
    Andrae Smith likes this.
  18. xanadu

    xanadu Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    802
    Likes Received:
    728
    Location:
    Cave of Ice
    I've wondered about this in reference to cases where the numeral is actually part of the word. For example, the band U2. I can't possibly imagine that the standard would be to spell it "U-two" in dialogue. Is that really the case?
     
  19. KaTrian

    KaTrian A foolish little beast. Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    5,393
    Location:
    Funland
    Yup. I was just thinking, like, if one was to write a character who has an uncanny ability to count stuff :D
     
    minstrel likes this.
  20. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    I'd let it stand as U2. It's the name of the band - the band is not called U-two. :)
     
    KaTrian likes this.
  21. EdFromNY

    EdFromNY Hope to improve with age Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    5,101
    Likes Received:
    3,203
    Location:
    Queens, NY
    @jannert - interesting that in the examples you cited from Strunk and White, the year 1990 was shown as a numeral. Or, was that your example?
     
  22. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    I guess it really only makes a difference when there are two ways of saying something. In your example, if someone swept fifty thousand seeds off the floor, would there be four thousand four hundred and twenty seven left, or forty-four hundred and twenty-seven? ;)
     
  23. KaTrian

    KaTrian A foolish little beast. Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    5,393
    Location:
    Funland
    Now that just made me wonder whether there are regional differences I should take into account when it comes to expressing numbers in words...
     
  24. T.Trian

    T.Trian Overly Pompous Bastard Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2013
    Messages:
    2,253
    Likes Received:
    1,470
    Location:
    Mushroom Land
    Nope, that's how it's written in their book, 'Elements of Style.' The whole bit she quoted is from the same book (just looked it up).

    ETA: Maybe that just goes to show how few absolutes there are to writing fiction 'cause a lot of people recommend 'Elements' (I've even seen a few publishers / agents recommend it on the guideline portion of their websites), but I suppose it's best to always check the guidelines of whomever you're submitting your MS to in order to find out what they want instead of doggedly holding onto some fixed rule you learned at some point, somewhere.
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2014
    EdFromNY likes this.
  25. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Hi Ed - No, that was exactly as they presented it.

    In the year nineteen-ninety, I turned twenty-one seems unnecessarily clunky and self-aware to me. Obviously, it did to them, too.

    The Elements of Style says, in its preface, that the styling conventions discussed in the book offer (acceptable) choices, rather than single rules ...as over the years, writers and editors have developed differing rules.

    Even Strunk & White recognise there are no absolutes when it comes to certain kinds of writing. I'd say fiction is pretty much an open playing field. The trick is how the reader follows what you've written, so I'd say use whatever works best.
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2014
    T.Trian likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice