1. lex

    lex Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    32

    "Self-published" is now one of the "Big 5" for e-book bestsellers (Forbes)

    Discussion in 'Electronic Publishing' started by lex, Dec 30, 2013.

    Here's a thing.

    According to this article in Forbes Magazine, "Self-published" accounted for more bestsellers than HarperCollins in 2013. Only Penguin Random House and Hachette did better.

    Ok, it's obviously not really quite comparing like with like, and nobody's pretending it is, but an interesting statistic nevertheless, and still further evidence (as if we needed any) that the obvious story in the world of digital books is the success of self-publishing.

    Indie authors not only managed to hit the list 99 times in 2013 - they also managed four No. 1 best-sellers.
     
    GingerCoffee likes this.
  2. A.M.P.

    A.M.P. People Buy My Books for the Bio Photo Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2013
    Messages:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    1,374
    Location:
    A Place with no History
    Well, I am glad there is some mathematical proof that puts self-publishing in a positive light.
    I prefer the traditional route out of habit but it's good to see new paths for authors to take.

    Just, let's not abuse it anymore than it already has :S
     
  3. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    That's not a bad showing, even though the top 2 have much higher numbers. It dispels the myth that self-publishing success is miniscule in comparison to success via traditional routes. There are good self-published works out there, and it looks like readers are finding them.
     
    lex likes this.
  4. shadowwalker

    shadowwalker Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    847
    Just out of curiosity, which best-seller list was this? Because it makes a difference - like the NYT list versus Amazon's list.

    Um, let's remember this is ebooks only. Add in print books and audio books and that myth is still not so much myth. That's a lot of sales most self-publishers still can't afford to go after, unfortunately.
     
  5. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    I'm impressed regardless.
     
    lex likes this.
  6. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    Yeah, the original post said "e-book bestsellers," so the subsequent comments were clearly directed to that same subject matter.
     
  7. shadowwalker

    shadowwalker Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    847
    Right. But I was addressing the part about the "myth" - and again, a lot of the impact of the article depends on which "best seller" list these figures came from.
     
  8. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    Again, clear from the context of the post. Your rush to find something negative to post in a thread on self-publishing apparently leads you to believe that the people on this site are stupid.
     
  9. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    [Insert popcorn smiley.]
     
  10. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    what is a 'popcorn' smiley?
     
  11. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    It's a smiley that indicates you plan to be a spectator for the discussion looking to ensue.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2013
  12. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    Here, I found one:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    Aw, we don't have a popcorn one?

    [​IMG]


    Getting back to the point of the article, the numbers are good, particularly given the surge in ebook sales. Instead of comparing self-published authors to those with traditional publication contracts, it makes more sense to look at the entire pool of writers on both ends - all of the aspiring writers who choose self-pub versus all of the aspiring writers who follow the traditional path.

    Fact is, most of the latter will never see a book in print. Some will be lucky enough to get into the ever-shrinking midlist, where you may not make enough to live on. And a tiny percentage of people will be very successful traditionally. That's the comparison.

    On the self-publishing side, everyone will get their book published, but only a tiny percentage will be very successful. If you're one of the authors who would have wallowed in the mid-list via the traditional route, I'm not convinced you don't stand a better chance with the self-publishing route.

    People on this forum, whether going the traditional route or self-publishing, aren't idiots. They understand that either way you need to put out a quality product if you want a real chance of making it (and that can happen via either publishing route). They understand it is hard work, either way, and that based purely on numbers, the odds are well against you, either way.

    Some apparently have an issue that makes it so they can hardly stand to see something good written about self-publishing. @shadowwalker, you may dress it up as though you're just trying to protect all the poor fools on the site from their own stupidity, but that's intellectually dishonest.
     
    outsider likes this.
  14. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    Damnit, ninja'ed by @GingerCoffee . That'll teach me to be long-winded.
     
    GingerCoffee likes this.
  15. shadowwalker

    shadowwalker Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    847
    So one is not allowed to ask a legitimate question about SP articles? Because to question is a sure sign of antagonism? How about just a straight answer to the question - which best seller list is this? How do they get their figures? Or is this another one of those "black box" deals where we're just supposed to accept on faith what the article says?

    I have to wonder why you get so angry whenever people don't just accept these types of articles. As to the "poor fools", I wasn't asking for them - whomever you think they are. I wanted to know because I like to make up my own mind as to the legitimacy of a "report". If the source is reliable, why would I dispute it? If it's not reliable, why should I accept it?
     
  16. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    I have to wonder why you assume people are angry, unless you're angry yourself. Do people get angry over discussions with anonymous other people on internet forums? Doesn't seem reasonable.

    Read the article and follow the links and you may find some of your questions answered.
     
    lex likes this.
  17. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Where did you guys get that popcorn smiley??? o_O
     
  18. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    I just found one online and pasted the URL :)
     
  19. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    Popcorn-Smiley-300x300.jpg
    Waaahhh ...can't find it ...waaahhh...
     
  20. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    There there, don't cry. [​IMG]

    I found an excellent link, bookmarked it for myself.

    http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys-basic-001.php
     
  21. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,889
    Location:
    Scotland
    oooh, fangs... snif
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2013
  22. lex

    lex Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    32
    I don't think one is a sign of antagonism at all.

    But I think one shouldn't altogether blame people for interpreting it that way when more or less the same kind of questions are asked, always with negative imputations/connotations, very repeatedly, by the same people in almost every thread discussing self-publishing.

    It's a real problem, in this forum. It doesn't happen like this in any of the other writing forums that I've seen.

    It drives members away (I was one of them, albeit that I've now tentatively returned).

    It also dissuades other writers - who may have much to offer - from joining (I myself know several in that group).

    In other words, it's really damaging to a small but very nice, very good forum which does apparently have a little difficulty (compared with some other equivalents) in "holding a quorum together".

    I was driven away from the forum over a year ago precisely because of this behavior (albeit in a more extreme form than what you've just asked about). I've returned and am participating here again only after being assured that "the climate has changed" now, and that much of the former irrational malice and hostility toward self-publishing has either dissolved or effectively been prevented. I'm eager to participate here, to re-assure others that things have changed, to encourage people to join/re-join, and so on. Just my own perspective.

    I also have several friends in exactly the same position as me (except they haven't yet joined/rejoined).

    I'm explaining this not in any way to try to criticize you, but simply to offer the perspective - of which you seem to me to be unaware - that this might actually very legitimately be a slightly sensitive issue around here, understandably, simply because of some aspects of this forum's very unusual history in this specific regard. Since you ask. And a very Happy New Year to you. :) ;)
     
  23. thirdwind

    thirdwind Member Contest Administrator Reviewer Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    7,851
    Likes Received:
    3,339
    Location:
    Boston
    One thing that may explain why self-published ebooks are so popular is the price. Just from a quick look through Amazon, I found that most of the self-published ebooks are between $2 and $4. On the other hand, ebooks released by publishers like Penguin et al. are selling for more than twice that. Given a choice, I'm sure most people would go for the cheaper option (unless there's a particular book they want to read).
     
  24. shadowwalker

    shadowwalker Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    847
    Let me just clarify that one reason (among many) that the climate has changed is because of PMs exchanged with Daniel concerning the summary deletion of threads and discussions concerning self-publishing. If I were antagonistic toward SP, those PMs would not have been sent.

    As to continually asking these types of questions, on other forums I am on, it is almost customary to look at articles (on damn near any subject) and questioning the voracity, particularly when generalized terms such as "best seller lists" and "award-winning author" are used. People want to know whether it's the NYT best-seller list or "Selling in Podunk Holler"; whether it's the Nobel Prize or third place in the Podunk Holler Founder's Day contest. It's through clarifying these things that we learn what to believe and what to discount. I see no reason why self-publishing should be a sacred cow. If people are unwilling or unable to answer such questions, why should others accept what is being said?
     
  25. lex

    lex Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    Messages:
    525
    Likes Received:
    32
    I know - I sent many myself. ;)

    I didn't suggest that you're antagonistic concerning self-publishing (not in my post above and not - I hasten to mention - to anyone else either!). I simply answered the question you asked. And only from my own perspective and that of others I know who wouldn't post here, as I said. :)
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice