1. blackstar21595

    blackstar21595 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    585
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY

    Is it superfluous?

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by blackstar21595, May 19, 2013.

    I'm debating between these two sentences.

    1. He shot an arrow.

    2. He drew his bow and shot an arrow.

    Do you think 'He drew his bow' is needed or can it be omitted if a bow is implied by the context of 'shot an arrow'?
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. Youniquee

    Youniquee (◡‿◡✿) Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Under your bed.
    I think it can be omitted, unless there's a reason you want to put emphasis on the fact he drew his bow...and also, I think by adding that extra bit makes it seem like a 'calm' scene? So, it's a action scene, I would suggest leaving it out.

    My 2 pence...hope that helped.
     
  3. erebh

    erebh Banned Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    2,642
    Likes Received:
    481
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Do you shoot a bullet? Or do you shoot a gun?

    To shoot an arrow would be to suggest the arrow was the target and he hit it. He would shoot a deer for example with the arrow - he wouldn't actually shoot the arrow.
     
  4. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    Depends. If you elaborated a bit ... "took careful aim", "drew instinctually", "pulled the bowstring, then hesitated" ... then I'd say keep it.

    If the action is quick, or there's something else you are emphasizing with the sentence, then I'd say, not needed.
     
  5. GingerCoffee

    GingerCoffee Web Surfer Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    18,385
    Likes Received:
    7,080
    Location:
    Ralph's side of the island.
    It's a bit of a missed analogy here, IMO. You don't have to say, he pulled the trigger and shot the gun. That would be a tad more analogous.

    Surely you've heard Longfellow's poem?
     
  6. blackstar21595

    blackstar21595 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    585
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    It feels different for bows though, since that would mean that if I can say "He shot the gun." then I could say "He shot the bow." And I don't feel the latter makes any sense.
     
  7. blackstar21595

    blackstar21595 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    585
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    Well I think this solved my question a little, since I imagined him shooting the arrow from a bow.
     
  8. mbinks89

    mbinks89 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2012
    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    Montreal
    #1 is better.
     
  9. muscle979

    muscle979 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    89
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Georgia
    You could say that he loosed an arrow if shot doesn't quite seem right.
     
  10. ChickenFreak

    ChickenFreak Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    15,262
    Likes Received:
    13,084
    The arrow implies the bow, and the bow implies the arrow, and for that matter "shot" implies both, if it's already been established that the character has a bow. I think that if you have one, you don't _need_ the other, though that doesn't necessarily mean that the other should be eliminated.

    So

    He drew his bow and shot an arrow, hitting the squirrel.

    could quite reasonably be replaced with:

    He shot the squirrel.

    or

    He drew his bow and shot an arrow into the air.

    with

    He shot an arrow into the air.


    In general, I'd say that the briefer version is better, unless there's a good reason for the longer one.
     
  11. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    I think it depends on the situation, and the experience and skill of the archer. If he's merely a boy in his first battle, you may want to say something like, "He drew his bow, struggling against his fear to remember the lessons his father had taught him ..."

    On the other hand, if he's an experienced hunter or warrior, "he shot an arrow" may be sufficient.

    Who is your character? What is the situation? Those should dictate how you phrase the sentence.
     
  12. blackstar21595

    blackstar21595 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    585
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    An experienced hunter.
     
  13. rhduke

    rhduke Member Reviewer

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2013
    Messages:
    755
    Likes Received:
    192
    Location:
    Canada
    I'd go with #1. If your showing him fire an arrow for the first time, or if there's no other reference to his bow before hand, then #2.
     
  14. shadowwalker

    shadowwalker Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    847
    I'd agree - whether to include it depends a lot on the pace of the scene, as well as what preceded the action. Was he hesitant, trying to decide whether to shoot at all? Then it would work, showing his decision - and could make it abrupt or deliberate.

    Sometimes short and concise works; other times, you lose something you really don't want to.
     
  15. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    one might also question whether he was drawing a picture of a bow... ;)

    seriously, 'drew a bow' and 'shot an arrow' are both common terms in the field of archery, so are ok to use...

    however, i have to agree with the poster who said 'drew his bow' isn't necessary unless one needs to add 'calmly' or 'with great effort' or some other indication of how he went about it...
     
  16. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    The main reason I might choose to include both drawing the bow and letting fly the arrow would be to emphasize that it takes more coordinated actions than swinging a sword or axe or firing an automatic weapon.
     
  17. TerraIncognita

    TerraIncognita Aggressively Nice Person Contributor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,332
    Likes Received:
    39
    Location:
    Texas
    Agreed.

    I like the imagery of "he drew the bow" more than "he shot the arrow". It gives a better mental image, imo. I can picture him taking aim and drawing it back and the care it would take.

    haha

    This is what I was thinking as well.


    Either one is alright in my book. I just prefer the other because it gives a clearer picture to me.
     
  18. heal41hp

    heal41hp Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2013
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Oklahoma, USA
    This is exactly what I was thinking. :) Omitting information like that can, to me, really damage the imagery I create in my head while I'm reading. When did the bow get pulled out? What other scenes will need to be adjusted in my head because this person's been running around with a ready bow for the last... who knows how long?

    The "calm" bit that Youniquee brought up reminded me of something I'd like to mention. I learned an interesting trick for manipulating perceived pacing through sentence length from Hemingway. The shorter the sentence is, the quicker it goes by and the faster the action seems. The longer the sentence, the longer the action seems to take. So the situation in which this thing is occurring, I think, will determine how much can get packed into this sentence. However, the question still remains because your hunter can ready his bow and sight his target in another (or multiple other) sentences prior to shooting. Examples:

    The hunter crouched low behind the oak. His eyes never left the buck. Lifting his bow, he nocked his last arrow. This was it. His last chance. He sighted the beast down the perfectly straight, perfectly smooth length of the arrow. Exhaling, he let go.

    Didn't intend to mix those but it still demonstrates what I'm going for I think. :)
     
  19. DungeonBrain

    DungeonBrain Banned

    Joined:
    May 22, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think we need more surrounding sentences before saying for sure. Was the character just doing something previously that occupied his hands? That could make for an awkward transition if the drawing action isn't communicated.
     
  20. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    good point!
     
  21. Anthony Martin

    Anthony Martin Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    San Diego
    #2 adds familiar imagery to the shot, that slow draw of the bow and taking of aim--this is the way to go for me unless he is on horseback riding through a pack of rabid zombies, picking them off one after another, spending little time to aim because his he is just trying to hold them off long enough to escape.

    I don't know where that came from it's early here and I should be working.
     
  22. Anthony Martin

    Anthony Martin Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2013
    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    San Diego
    --double post--
     
  23. ProsonicLive

    ProsonicLive New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2013
    Messages:
    117
    Likes Received:
    6
    Option 1 He shot an arrow-sounds like you will focus more on the effect of the arrow being shot or the event of the arrow shooting is just a filler on the way to something else
    option 2 suggests more drama and a possible horrible or at very least bad outcome should the shot be missed. however, the way that you have it worded, while not totally confusing, may need some clarification in my opinion. when you "draw" a bow, you are actually talking about three different definitions
    1 pulling the bow from wherever it is stored, usually from the shoulder or under the arm, the back is actually not conducive to making quick shots.
    2 drawing of the string to make a shot.-this has assumed the arrow (or bolt in a crossbow case) has already been "notched" or "knocked" in some archery circles.
    3 when stringing a simple or recurve bow (non-compound) the upper and lower bought must be "drawn" - technically this could work in your sentence depending on how much you assume your reader knows about archery. I know that this is not what you are talking about, but I think it could stand some clarification. as option one and two are closely related.
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice