1. dillseed
    Offline

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19

    struck vs. stricken

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by dillseed, May 27, 2014.

    Do these look right? Which are definitely incorrect?

    •The judge ordered that it be stricken (not 'struck') from the record.
    •He was stricken with (not 'stricken by') cancer. [Or is 'stricken by cancer' correct, too?]
    •She was stricken with guilt.
    •She was stricken by guilt.
    •Lightning struck the tree.
    •Lightning had struck the tree.
    •Lightning has struck the tree.

    Thank you. :)
     
  2. stevesh
    Offline

    stevesh Banned Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    968
    Likes Received:
    646
    Location:
    Mid-Michigan USA
    I would write 'stricken by' in the cases of cancer and guilt (if I used the word at all, which I probably wouldn't). The rest look right to me.
     
  3. Poziga
    Offline

    Poziga Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    521
    Likes Received:
    273
    Location:
    Slovenia
    Stricken is used in adjectival function: A stricken heart. Be stricken with fever. Be stricken in years. Fever-stricken, poverty-stricken...
     
  4. dillseed
    Offline

    dillseed Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2013
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    19
    Thank you. :)
     

Share This Page