Show and Tell

By Cogito · Jun 3, 2009 · ·
Categories:
  1. Spend any time around writers, and you will surely hear the sage but cryptic advice, "Show, don't tell." But what the heck does it mean, and why do people keep saying it? Is it a hard and fast rule, or are there times you should and should not follow it?

    First off, what is it? Here's a simple example:
    In both cases, we know Gwen was embarassed. The first version comes straight out and tells us, while the second version shows us through her reactions.

    "But wait," you say. "Isn't the second one telling us she is blushing, and that she is looking at her hands?" Yes, but you have to think in terms of the real message being conveyed. In this case, Gwen's emotional state is the message.

    In this example, showing takes more words. On the other hand, her reaction reveals more than simple embarassment. It implies a bashful response, probably to a compliment, as opposed to humiliation or some other form or embarassment. It's a richer expression of her emotional state. If you really told what her emotion is, it would probably require considerably more words than the showing.

    Many people assume that showing requires more words than telling. It may be true in the simplest examples, but showing is often much more concise when the message is complex or ambiguous. Emotions and sensations are often complicated, with conflicting components.

    Consider point of view. When we watch two people having a quiet conversation in a restaurant, we can't read their thoughts and tap into their nerve impulses. But we can see if one person is angry, or afraid, or distressd. How do we know? By the body languiage, actions like crying or a raised or trembling voice, all the elements you would write when showing those feelings. By showing in your writing instead of telling, you help preserve the point of view.

    Showing isn't limited to character moods and feelings though. You can also use it to describe setting. For example, you could describe a street as cold and windy, or you can show it though a character's reaction to it, pulling his coat tight and leaning forward to protect his face from windblown ice crystals.

    Showing can help you experience the setting better than telling, because you know what such a day feels like from your own experiences.

    But that doesn't mean you should never tell instead of showing. Sometimes simply saying:
    is a completely adequate and concise description, for instance after he walked five miles to town from his broken-down car. There's nothing more to gain by showing him shuffling into town, slumping down onto a park bench, and taking his shoes off to check his feet for blisters.

    Showing is often more expressive, but it can take more thought to do it well, and sometimes it just isn't the best choice anyway. So although it's always good advice to consider showing vs, telling, it isn't the answer in every situation.

    Good writing will judiciously mix them. Show and tell.
    Categories:

Comments

  1. jonathan hernandez13
    good points Cogito, I always discourage people from telling, even though I do it a lot too. In some cases telling is efficient and has its uses, you are a very wise teacher.:cool:
  2. Sound of Silence
    It's good to see the majority of writing sites finally promoting show/tell over show, don't tell.

    The only bone of contention I have with the majority of show and tell articles is that that they mainly cover narrative show and tell. They rarely touch on the dialogical aspect of the technique, i.e. how dialogue also exploits show and tell, possibly more provocatively than narrative S & T does.
  3. Tobias
    Great! I love this!
  4. ashleydalelong
    If I am writing or reading a good book, and I fall into a spell as if I can smell, feel, or even see what the character does then that makes it so much better. My goal is for the reader to feel like he or she is in the shoes of the character.
  5. Robert Lipscombe
    show? or tell? It's important to remember that language is parasitic on event, and event is usually rendered into language by means of metaphor, so where does that take us? I'm saying it's hard to show rather than tell, because showing requires language just as much, even more, than telling. The point is, though, showing allows the reader a richer experience..of precision as much as of ambiguity. So, yeah, show, show and show again, and only tell if you're hurrying on to something shown which is much more exciting, but you've got to get there - and quickly too!
  6. Beetlejuice
    You make a very interesting point. Sometimes, I find it difficult to show rather than tell. I hope I can remember the points you have made here.

    Telling is also important. Yay! Good for me. All I have to do is to remember when to shift. :eek:
  7. Manav
    Hi Cogito,

    I am new to writing. After reading this blog post I just realize that a piece I have written and posted in the forum (general fiction) is all 'show' and no 'tell' piece. Or, am I wrong in thinking that way about my piece? I would love to know what you think of it.

    http://www.writingforums.org/showthread.php?t=30126
  8. Capt Bob
    In Poker, the reading of the outward physical manifestations "shown" by the other players will give vital information on the strengths and weaknesses of their hands, when read by the experienced/observant player. These visible, physical signs are called "Tells".
    Curious use of parallel language, what?.

    I find it much more rewarding to to the reader by placing him mentally into the scene rather than sitting back lazily being fed a "telling" narrative.

    just be careful not to escalate into "extremis" as Hemingway was often prone to.
  9. Radrook
    A piece can be impoverished by the lack of either sufficient show or tell. As Cogito pointed out, a balance has to be sought. What that balance is depends on the exigencies of the story. How much tension does the author want the reader to feel? How important is it for the reader to feel instead of simply know? The basic mistake to avoid is assuming that the reader is seeing or feeling as we want him to without our adequate help.

    Telling the reader that a door is imposing without having described that door as such is one example. Or saying that a woman is enchanting without describing her enchantments is another. Once the writer realizes that the reader totally depends on him in that crucial way the mistake of telling when showing is called for will be greatly reduced.
      Maverick_nc likes this.
  10. Faust
    Great advice as always. I tip my hat to you sir.
  11. ScreamsfromtheCrematory
    I think it's a bit of a contextual thing for when you use showing and telling, with the former IMO greater for setting in more powerful implications of the "it's up to the reader to figure it out" sort.
  12. Khanmfawad
    Its such a good advice for adding feeling to your writing!! :)
  13. Ettina
    I think the biggest problem with too much telling is that your writing will show things whether you intend them or not. If you're not aware of how to show what you want, you'll end up telling one thing and showing another.
  14. JohnnoH
    I always think that showing draws the reader in far more than telling. It keeps the suspense of the journey. Great post.Active Voice
  15. Kheper
    I usually ask people to balance their show and tell. Sometimes telling helps to sum things up. In the end, showing is what you should focus on the most.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice