...or "You don't even have to read between the lines anymore."
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/kelseyweekman/instagram-avatars-meta-facebook
Sure, Buzzfeed writers definitely don't represent their generations (and this one quite clearly has a Zuck-positive agenda), but I can't ignore how illustrative this is.
From the Author:
"My experience with online avatars started in elementary school, when I used my profiles for online games like Millsberry and My Scene to determine if I really hated wearing pink or just wanted to subvert gendered expectations. In college, my little brunette Bitmoji one day magically became blonde, and weeks later I did too (though it involved a lot more chemicals and money). Even now, I hop onto the website Picrew when I would rather look at a cartoon version of myself with perfect makeup clutching an iced coffee than scroll through a thousand imperfect selfies that don’t reflect how I want people to see me."
Questions lurk.
1. Only selfies. Why is no one else taking pictures of her?
2. How can, out of thousands of pictures, not so much as one of them represent her?
3. Note the word usage: "...when I would rather look at..." turns into "...imperfect selfies that don't reflect how I want people to see me." Her, other people, or both?
She goes on:
"Justin Hochberg, CEO and cofounder of Virtual Brand Group, told me that the self-expression allowed by digital avatars can be 'life-changing.'
'It’s terribly unfortunate that people cringe at the thought of allowing people to be who they are and not who you expect them to be,' he said. 'I think that says more about how they feel about themselves.'"
This is satirical, truly.
You could be reading this and thinking, "So what? Avatars aren't a big deal. It's harmless fun." You are correct. The harm has already been done decades past.
Comments
Sort Comments By