Don't Write It If You Don't Feel It

By GrantG · Jul 29, 2009 · ·
  1. If I could go back in time and tell my younger self just one thing, it'd be this: don't write it if you don't feel it. I can't go back in time, but I can tell beginning writers now what I wish I knew then. It's a simple rule. Unlike most rules in writing, it's one I believe can never be broken.

    Don't write it if you don't feel it.

    I would have avoided so many unfinished projects, so many false starts. Which isn't to say I don't have the occasional failure these days, but I have definitely seen an increase in my yearly production.

    It's the secret that any great writer who deserves his or her fame knows. For me, it was like a revelation. Today, I don't even consider anything I wrote before I learned the secret worth publishing.

    In his book about writing, Ray Bradbury says he stumbled upon the secret in his early twenties. Up until then, he had never written anything meaningful at all. One day he wrote a short story about a childhood event: he was at the beach and a little girl he had been playing with went into the ocean, but didn't come out. For the first time in his life, he felt that he had written something truly beautiful because he had written something that he felt.

    Later, he wrote Fahrenheit 451, which he claims wasn't the cautionary tale about censorship that many made it out to be; he says the concept arose from his love for books, plain and simple. Whatever his reasons, he felt something when he wrote that story. It wasn't just a cool idea he had one day.

    And another example: in an article published in the June issue of this year's Asimov's, science fiction writer Cory Doctorow claims the best piece of advice he ever received was when James Patrick Kelly told him: "You need to learn to sit down at a keyboard and open a vein."

    Many beginning writers try to make a story out of any and every cool idea that comes along. Then they wonder why only their friends and family love it. Yes, the story itself is the most important element, but it's meaningless without the heart.

Comments

  1. Kirvee
    I agree with this.

    Actually, I've known that for a long time, since I was maybe 14. I can never sit down and force myself to write something, I always have to be in the mood and mindset to write with all I have, a concept my mom has trouble understanding.

    Thank you for this :-D.
  2. crime.prose
    The primary reason it has to be from the heart is motivation. Writing decent material takes much effort, time and above all endurance. Even then much stuff has to be binned. Writing is a lonely old slog.

    The other reason, to write well you need to know what you're writing about. You must be in touch with what you're writing about. Otherwise it risks being ill-informed.
  3. crime.prose
    The primary reason it has to be from the heart is motivation. Writing decent material takes much effort, time and above all endurance. Even then much stuff has to be binned. Writing is a lonely old slog.

    The other reason, to write well you need to know what you're writing about. You must be in touch with what you're writing about. Otherwise it risks being ill-informed.
  4. ERE5 M
    I completely agree with you. I didn't start writing until a year ago. Up until that point, I had never written anything at all. Suddenly I just poured out short story after short story, then I was done. Months went by, and suddenly I started writing again...and I wrote about 10,000 words of a novel in a week...then I was done again. I write in bunches, and with emotion only. This is one of the most intelligent posts I have read, thank you for sharing.
  5. Agreen
    It stands to reason- if the writer is not interested in his work how can he expect a reader to care?
  6. Forkfoot
    This is great. Thank you for sharing this with us.
  7. jonathan hernandez13
    Im sorry to be the first one to disagree with your blog post, and everyone else here, but telling a writer to only write when they 'feel' it is suicide.

    If there is a writer who gets his meal tickets based on his writing, and especially in the case of a more than likely underpaid SF writer who gets paid a pittance per word, equally good advice would be 'write until your hands fall off, and then, write with your feet'!

    I agree that writing is an art, I agree that there is as much heart as there is brain in literature. I agree: quality over quantity, but (and there is a big but), what kind of a message are the publishers sending to young writers by stacking the shelves with drivel?

    You dont have to be an economics major to understand supply versus demand, Steinback in the modern age would be a starving artist, or at best a fervent twitterer, but this is an age of hacks and airport paperback readers who dont have time or patience for true art.

    The way history remembers and honors the masters is by forcing kids to read Farenheit 451 over a summer, along with Moby Dick, Call of the Wild, etc, and expecting them to absorb it all in a few months. Even I cant do that. Result? Cliffnotes, robbing the youths of the opportunity to experience it in their own way, which was intended. Ironically Farenheit 451 was about book censorship, we have something far worse than the burning of books, when people dont want to read them it has nearly the same effect.

    In closing, if a writer was left to 'write when the mood struck them', and the mood came too infrequently, or never at all, what they are left with is a three letter character untitled word document with 'the' as the opening. No need to worry, we'll get around to finishing it someday, we just need more 'time'. Usually what people mean when they say that is that they lack the commitment or discipline to see a dream through, and are making up excuses (I am not without blame nor trying to cast the first stone, just see my more in depth opinions on this in my blog 'if you are a writer, write').

    There is a thin line dividing professional writers from hobbyists, and I think its habits rather than 'feelings'
  8. GrantG
    First off, I agree that it's largely habits over feelings that works for successful writers (not just for today's successful writers, either). I don't believe the vast majority of mere weekend writers can ever even aspire to "drivel." I think Tom Clancy writes drivel, but I imagine that he writes it everyday -- he's got the habit, no question about it. But I do believe that stories about boringly normal people who fight evil terrorists once or twice in the course of a six hundred page, thinly disguised soapbox novel are stories written directly from his heart. I haven't read Twilight, but I'm sure those of you on this forum that did think it's drivel, too. But the author wrote something that was close to her heart, which was, from what I've heard, a case for abstinence until marriage. So no, I don't believe that the majority of the stuff on the airport's shelves were written by authors that didn't have their hearts in it in one way or another. That's not to say it's not capable of being drivel. And I'm not trying to suggest that heartless writers don't occasionally slip through the cracks, but I imagine the ones who do are usually one-hit wonders.

    And I'm not suggesting you should only write when you feel like it. That is suicide. No matter how inspired I am when I come up with the idea, there will be days when I just don't feel like writing. I will write anyway. You can't let your projects sit and gather dust because you're waiting for inspiration. I think on that point we agree. Writing is entirely a cerebral function. I mean, when I say I write from my heart, I really don't believe I'm talking about the organ that sits in my chest.

    What I am suggesting is that you should only use a story idea that's close to your heart. If you don't, you won't write on those days that you're not feeling it. And if you're at a lack of ideas that touch you in one way or another, you're either doing something wrong or you haven't formed the right habits. You should already have your next worthy idea, or a lot of worthy ideas, before you're finished writing about the current one, no matter how frequently you finish projects. A good writer should always have something to say, even if it's for a throwaway piece or a work-for-hire; if they have so few worthy ideas that they can't stand to throw one away to something that's "just for the money," they're in the wrong business. You won't form good writing habits unless you have the heart to drive you through the overwhelming amount of labor that comes with being a writer.

    However, I'm glad you commented. I agree with a lot of what you say. Although I have never read anything that you have written, if I had to guess, I'd say you're probably using your heart more than you think.

    But the best point you bring up is you can't get by on heart alone, nor can you get by solely on the love of art. I wish more people brought this fact up. It will save a lot of people a lot of heartbreak.
  9. jonathan hernandez13
    well said brother, I think that you and I share a great deal;)
  10. GrantG
    Yeah, so it seems. I have been reading your blog. I dig it.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice