My Rules of Representation

By Oscar Leigh · Mar 26, 2016 · ·
  1. So an important part of today's culture is navigating offense. A lot of people have said that 2015 was "the year everything was offensive" or some such. Now. there are two ways to treat this subject wrong. There are those who are too offensive, and there are those who are too offended. How do you consider this when writing a character of politically sensitive group e.g. a gay or an African-American? This is my thoughts on the subject:
    First of, the most important rule. One character is just one character. Only a very assumptive person thinks one character is somehow a standard of representation for an entire minority. Even if they're the only person of that group in your book, if you've got positive representation elsewhere it's actually a good thing because it's acknowledging that the group is human and therefore can be diverse. For example, I've heard people say Piper Chapman from Orange is the New Black is perpetuating negative bi stereotypes. However, if we don't allow one character to be like that, then all we are really demanding is that group gets to be represented with special privileges. That they get to be immune to negative stereotypes even when those people often give negative stereotype representations of right-wing religious people. Everyone gets to be portrayed with bad examples.
    Second, stereotypes are only bad in one character if they dominate the character. If you have , say, a Muslim extremist character, as long as there are characteristics of that character that aren't complete stereotypes, that is fine. Some people of groups are like the stereotypes, and to suggest those characteristics are automatically shallow or something is actually kind of offensive to them. In fact, a lot of stereotypes are kind of true. It's quite possible that gays are more often effeminate. And we all know black-dominated neighbourhoods in America are more likely to be poor which also increases the crime rate. Like you would always, presuming your interested in a three-dimensional and serious story, write them humanly and they will be just as great as a good non-stereotypical character. No kind of character you should think you can't write well, it's a illusionary obstacle that it will make a character bad to have elements of stereotype.
    Third, play with representation. This is more of a extra thing, but I love to have characters with stereotypical elements that then surprise you by having other elements you wouldn't expect of that kind of person. For example, Luke is a jock and he's a reasonably blokey Australian jock, but he's also quite gentle, very sensitive, and reads literature. And he's gay. I think characters like that are in some ways some of the best reminders of humanity.
    Thank you for time. Hope you have a good day. :blowkiss::blowkiss:
    AdDIct and BruceA like this.

Comments

  1. AdDIct
    I agree totally, if you're aiming to be at all concentious about stuff like that, which I'm generally not. I'm just sort of like this char is the way he is because that's how they are. Granted, I'm biased towards African Americans since I am one and I generally like to place my black characters in some sort of position of authority (ie Toni owning a modest book store but being head honcho of the Locusts and one of the most powerful characters in my book) and avoid giving them backstories like "they were in jail but turned a new leaf" (Clint's just rich. Idk why. No one knows why. That's his thing. He's just rich and sharp as a whip) That's just what I avoid. Not a fan of that. Still does that mean they're necessarily good people? Nah. It just means their past is a little different. I think the biggest issue with representation is people really only making mention of it when it's negative in media. It'd go a long way if instead of just like "avoid stereotypes" and stuff we were just like "In this book/movie so and so was this thing" and just leave it at that instead of making a big to do over it. Or if you're going to make a to do over the bad do the same for the good.
      Oscar Leigh likes this.
  2. Oscar Leigh
    You're African American? :supershock: I guess I always imagined you like Ozzie.
    Now, what exactly are you saying? My whole point was that being sensitive with representation is easy and we shouldn't make a deal of it because it's not something that needs to be forced usually. I agree with what you said, although they do actually make a big deal about positive representation; the Advocate sometimes has a whole online article just because one show has a new gay character, it's silly.
      AdDIct likes this.
  3. Oscar Leigh
    Oops, meant "make" a big deal. Fixed.
  4. AdDIct
    LOL yeah nah, my profile before the Ozzie pics was me, was black and white but if I looked like any character in my book I'd probably be closest to Clint.

    And I guess where I am in America it seems like I'm only hearing about how something or other is being negatively construed in media ie the Beyonce Super Bowl performance and subsequent Formation video (which was taken down within 24hours of posting). Not going into my opinion over that but my point I guess is id rather not have this be an issue at all. Like I feel like if there really is a hard pressed injustice make news about it, but not everything is actually relevant on that front. Sort of off topic, but it sort of bleeds into the represenation in that you'll see people complaining about there not being enough diversity in one movie and then omg there cast is like all minority the nrxt. It's like okay they did this, it's fiction not every movie/show etc needs to be viewed in a politically correct light. If that makes sense. I guess I just want to reach a point where this type of thing isnt an issue, period. Wishful thinking. Probably but eh.
      Oscar Leigh likes this.
  5. Oscar Leigh
    Yeah. Some stories have reasons not to have minorities. And some have reasons to have loads. The only problem I have is things like; in the past, not now, gay or bi characters were always sadistic serial killers or paedophiles or at best an effeminate stereotype and only underground lGBT made film were fair with representation. Only the extremes should be held to mean something. When it's a clear, strong trend that has an impact on people's psychology e.g. enforcing the feeling that there is something wrong with you if you have homosexual elements. Or like the Oscars scandal were they continue to have notably unrepresentative awardings that are too strong and consistent to explained by chance. There's something going on with the Oscars academy membership in terms of bias. But again, other than those kinds of things, it's generally not a problem. Which was my point. We shouldn't engineer our work to be perfectly representative because it's not necessary. We get too worked up about "oh this tv show has so number of minorities and that's great, or this book has so number of minorities and that's clearly the result of bigotry!!!" No witch-hunts please.:p
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice