Save Our Sci-Fi

By Banzai · Oct 31, 2010 · ·
Categories:
  1. [Copied and pasted from my external blog. Please do take a look. I'm trying to update regularly, every few days or so]

    So, earlier this week BSG spin-off series Caprica was cancelled. I’m not going to spend this blog entry moaning specifically about that, for two reasons. Firstly, I’m quite behind on the series, only a few episodes in, and thus haven’t decided whether it will meet it’s potential (but rest assured, the potential is there). Secondly, there are plenty of other people across the interwebs doing just that.

    No, my complaint here is a more general trend indicated in the cancellation; that of good sci-fi television being cut short without being given a real chance. Or worse, being positively brilliant. Firefly is the obvious example, but far from the only instance.

    I remember when I was growing up, the TV schedules were full of science-fiction. It wasn’t all good, but it was certainly there. The Star Trek Franchise was working its way through The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, and Voyager (not to mention several films- some of them even good). The X-Files was giving us conspiracy theories and aliens being investigated by an FBI duo with a taste for sunflower seeds and interesting pronunciation of the English language. Babylon 5 was doing something, though quite what I’m not entirely sure, as I’ve never actually watched an episode. Stargate SG-1 was taking us to distant worlds through a bowl of jelly, with MacGyver as a tour guide.

    And there were myriads of smaller, lesser-known sci-fi shows floating around. Five seasons of Andromeda, with Kevin Sorbo whizzing about as Hercules in space, for Christ’s sake. And five seasons of pseudo-philosophical nonsense with Earth Final Conflict (both, incidentally, mining the last vestiges of the late Gene Roddenberry’s imagination). If even these more obscure things managed to prosper, hopefully it will give you a hint of how strong the genre used to do.

    Nowadays, they seem to struggle. Aside from the utter bollocks of Firefly’s cancellation (midway through one of the best first seasons I’ve ever seen from a TV series, of any genre), there are a host of similar cancellations littering the path. The demise of the mutated Stargate SG-1 and misguided spin-off Stargate Atlantis probably won’t be much mourned, but back in the 2003 outstanding Australian offering Farscape was given the chop too. Since then Dollhouse (Joss Whedon’s other sci-fi project) has been given its marching orders, lesser-known but still praise-worthy Denying Gravity was denied a second season, as was Flashforward (not a patch on the book, but still better than Lost by a wide margin). And that’s to say nothing of the countless great ideas which have undoubtedly been turned down.

    What I think this amounts to, in my opinion, is a shift in the perception of sci-fi. It just doesn’t seem to be cool any more. The only science-fiction series that I can think of to have run its full course rather than being prematurely cancelled is Caprica‘s parent show, Ronald D. Moore’s sterling remake of Battlestar Galactica.

    When you factor in the Sci-Fi channel’s bizzare and much-documented name change to SyFy, I think we have to accept that TV studios are not keen on the genre any more. The flagship genre representatives at the moment are X-Files lookalike Fringe (which is fantastic, and if they go anywhere near it with an axe I’m going to have to resort to violence), bold reinvention of the original franchise Stargate Universe, and the BBC’s reinvention of the Doctor Who franchise (which may be facing difficulties of a different sort, before too long). Of course, you have the V remake, but I think the less said about that diluted cat piss the better.

    Is there a deeper root to this downturn? Are people not dreaming of the future any more? Do we not look up at the stars and dream of what could be out there? If you look at real world events, such as Obama’s attitude towards NASA, you might think so. I don’t know the answer to that one, but my favourite television genre seems to be under siege at the moment.

    Hollywood has never gotten sci-fi. They’ve made token efforts, and sometimes done fairly well, but the extended possibilities of a TV series, of a long story arc, has always seemed the natural home of video science-fiction to me. If it’s going to be allowed to vanish from our screens, I fear not only for the genre, but for humanity’s approach to the future. Science-fiction is, to me at least, imagination incarnate. It is the ultimate “what if?”. And I think we really do need that.

    Maybe you disagree, but all I’m really saying here is give sci-fi a chance.
    Categories:

Comments

  1. Taylee91
    Yes, I agree :D I love Sci-Fi. Our world would be so much different without it. Where would our sense of adventure go? Our sense of, "Oh heck, let's do it!" Most of all, what would happen to the capacity of our brains? They'd shrink without being challenged each day without the simple, "What if?" scenario.
  2. Cogito
    I hadn't heard about Caprica's cancellation. I am very disappointed. This was a smart series, and that may be the problem.

    I've been disquieted by visits to the bookstore in the last couple years. I don't see many new original science fiction novels, nor do I see many new SF authors appearing. I see more fantasy, particularly supernatural fiction, and a large quantity of franchise entries (Star Trek, Star Wars, Halo, etc).

    I hope it turns around soon, with more speculative fiction intended to make readers think.
  3. Tessie
    I heartily agree. Sci-Fi just isn't the same. The genre is almost like an endangered species, and people, I don't know, they almost don't believe in it anymore. I, for one, love to gaze into the black beyond, and ponder the wonders of the universe. Has our age come to this? They don't "think" anymore. They don't believe in the invisible. Save Sci-Fi!
  4. Speedy
    Supply and demand.

    To many people would prefer shows that don't push the braincells to far, over shows that leave you to ponder the hours away.

    I had to watch an episode of Gossip Girl the other day. My wish for an aneurysm never came.

    We just live in a time that that refuses to challenge reality, the universe etc. And for young people that just don't get pushed in such a field, do you think they really care for Sci/Fi (Sure some will, but will the masses).

    1940-1980s where a time where a lot of people questioned the bigger picture (Post WWII, Cold War etc). And thus SciFi rocketed.

    Today, what do we have to push us. Thus, why so many people watch Gossip Girl, The Hills or some CSI crap.

    I do wish the trend of current "ins" gets replaced by the good old days though. ;)
  5. w176
    On the other hand, urban chick lit fatasy been giving more and more room since Buffy, and do sort of speak to the same viewers. A bit geeky 15-35, but this time a mainly female audience.

    I think geeky escapist series still have about as a fair share of the market, but it more aimed at fantasy/horror and female fanbase.

    Edit: Refuse to challage reality? Pfft. Al lot of awesome series is going on everything from Lost, to Heroes to True Blood.

    If anything we got a border front challenging reality then ever.
  6. arron89
    Changes in how the public feel about speculative fiction in general are very dependent on what is happening in the world at the time.In the 17th century, there was very little interest in fantasy or what might have been early science fiction, but by the Age of Enlightenment in the 18th century, speculative fiction was all the rage, and some of the best works of the period were forerunners of scifi. In the 19th century, there was a lot more concern with class and society, so social realism was beginning to dominate literary tastes, and then in the 20th century, with another scientific golden age, public interest was renewed in the possibilities of science fiction. I think now, in the 21st century, people are bored of science, and thus of science fiction. We're again more concerned with things on a personal scale--family dramas, social realism, reality tv.

    Basically, speculative fiction seems to ebb and flow every century or so. So you might've been born into an unlucky period...
  7. Speedy
    @Arron - Well said. Agreed.
  8. Taylee91
    Aye, the tides of change...
  9. Wreybies
    I agree with Arron as well but for differing reasons. Science Fiction has an unfortunate tendency to get lost in its own wardrobe department. The trappings start to become more important than story. Hard to avoid given that the trappings are rather far removed from the everyday life of the everyday reader. When this happens then the genre loses its way and its purpose and becomes manky. And then when the odd decent title comes along or even wave of titles, the public look askance because, "What? That drivel? I haven't the time, thank you." Not until there is some decent momentum that can crash a wave upon the shore (so to speak) does the genre revive and reassert itself.
  10. jonathan hernandez13
    I'm just as concerned as you are about this apparent trend Matt. I also have a similar blog here on the forum, I have no easy answers. I think I have different tastes than you do as what constitutes a 'good' show. SG1 and its Atlantis offshoot for example were silly and almost juvenile, but knew it and made tongue in cheek jokes about it. I cant stand fiction that gets too preachy or serious on me.

    Like Cog said, whenever I go to the book stores these days I nearly gasp, the SF section is slowly being absorbed by the nearby Manga section or the adjacent romance.

    The Fantasy must still be selling though, because it takes up alot of room and those books are practically flying off the shelves because they're selling so well.

    In terms of literature SF is taking a heavy beating, and this can be seen in television as well. When I was a kid, several major SF programs could have been on TV at any given time. At one point Star Trek TNG, DS9, and Voyager were all on the same week. Back in those days I just took them for granted. Now we long for those good old days.

    In any case the genre will never fully die out, if anything it will just go underground for a bit.
  11. arron89
    Having just read a headline proclaiming that scientists have discovered a way to erase bad memories, it strikes me that its possible that the reason sci-fi is not as popular as it once was is that it has been subsumed by actual science. When authors like Philip K Dick wrote about cloning and mind control and Asimov wrote about robotics, they were things the distant future threatened. Now they are here. And have been for quite a while, in fact. And, for the most part, have been taken over by the political sphere and legislated, or by the corporate world and patented.

    Which I guess leads to a question for you more avid fans of sci-fi: given that real science has caught up to (or ruled out the possibilities of) fictional science, where can speculative science fiction go from here?
  12. jonathan hernandez13
    SF can still speculate on areas where we are still vastly ignorant, like on the nature of alien intelligence.

    To be honest, we don't have to leave the system to pontificate, while machines are getting smarter every day they are still far from true AI.

    Good point though Aaron, with once innovative ideas like time travel now mundane, people can easily get bored of the old classic SF staples.:rolleyes:

    I'll try my hardest to be original, but it's damn hard when it seems like everything has already been done to death.
  13. Banzai
    Actually, of all the explanations and speculations I've read, that one resonates the most true. I think that probably is a large part of the reason behind the mainstream's growing disinterest in SF. We are living pretty much in the future that the likes of Dick, Asimov and Heinlein predicted.

    However, I don't think that necessarily has to mean a dead end for SF. Certainly in literature terms, I've been seeing a boom in "near-future" SF, dealing with the scientific innovations and social issues of the moment, taken maybe a decade or two forwards to examine possible consequences. I think (hope) we could see a boom in this realist-SF shortly.

    There's also the fact that SF is about analogy for social comment just as much as scientific accuracy and genre tropes. District 9 did it wonderfully with racism and segregation, many times BSG and Caprica did it with various issues, and the V remake missed out on a golden opportunity to comment on Obama's healthcare reforms.

    I don't think that SF needs be at an end, or even that it needs substantially change. But I do think that the perception needs to change, and TV and Hollywood both need to look a little deeper into the SF genre scene to find the really relevant stuff for today.
  14. Tessie
    That is the ultimate problem with humanity today. For SF authors, it's becoming harder to lie to readers convincingly.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice