Show Don't Tell!!

By J.D. Ray · Feb 22, 2020 · ·
  1. Several people on this forum criticized (rightly) my posted fragments of "Lives in Time" with the common refrain of "show, don't tell!" Like many, I struggle with this. It's something I probably need to revise in my interpersonal manner as well; I'm wordy, and people get bored listening to me.

    In an effort to resolve the situation, I took @Stormburn's advice and purchased and read a copy of "Understanding Show, Don't Tell: (And Really Getting It) (Skill Builders Series Book 1)" by Janice Hardy. It's a practical and pragmatic guide to finding and resolving instances of telling instead of showing in your fictional works.

    Lucky for me, Scrivener has a feature where you can put a list of words into the search box and it finds all instances of those words in your work, highlights them, and makes a list of the documents that is easy to navigate through. In the appendix of the book, Hardy provides lists of words in categories. I used those lists to seek out opportunities for revision.

    I did not, however, take her advice wholesale (and she doesn't expect her readers to do so). Sure, words like thought or realized are red flag words for places that can be revised, so this:

    After the man had gone, Marko thought they ought to get to the safety of Pula's crowded streets.
    Becomes this:

    After the man had gone, Marko wanted to get to the safety of Pula's crowded streets.​

    And this:

    Marko realized that, like him, she had come to accept that they, or at least one of them, was not dreaming.
    Becomes this:

    Marko could see that, like him, she had come to accept that they, or at least one of them, was not dreaming.
    Small changes, but effective.

    I find that leaving words like this in dialogue makes it seem more real. People don't speak formally, and wrenching streams of dialogue around so it always has that show, don't tell panache can strip it of a sense of realism.

    Additionally, uses like, "Marko thought about the things that made a man civilized, and couldn’t find it in himself to set them aside" and "Now, at the docks of Rovinj, they realized that the sight of a man and a woman carrying a clearly heavy load on a pole through the streets would draw unwanted attention. appear, to me at least, valid.

    In all, I found Hardy's recommendations very helpful, and look forward to reading the next book in her series. By title, at least, it appears I have need of every Skill Builders book she has written.

Comments

  1. jim onion
    In my experience, the "how to" writing books that are designed as workbooks are the best. Learning how to write is in large part an active process, and so it's wonderful when expert advice is paired with a space for practice.

    Thanks for sharing this with us Ray!

    Steven Pressfield's "The War of Art" was a great motivational kick in the butt, for me. Completely reframed how I think about the process.
  2. Steve Rivers
    Yeah, it's not a hard and fast rule. I think (from all the book reviews Ive read) most people tend to get aggrivated the most when its about description.
    "Liv was sat painting."
    I would write as
    "Liv picked up the brush and put it to her easel. "


    When you tell a story from a person's perspective, many readers don't seem to mind as much being informed of a character's thoughts when there are no facial clues.


    So when I write a scene, I tend to act it out, and if the character cant express their feelings or thoughts through dialogue, expression, or they themselves arent very expressive people, then I resort to thought and realized or wanted and could see that (I like mixing it up myself. Always adhering to one version I find sounds like it was novel written by Grammarly heh)
      J.D. Ray and Some Guy like this.
  3. Some Guy
    I totally crutch on Grammerly, cause... yeah. LOL, I do tell it to fukkoff sometimes. Right about the time I say 'fukk show-don't-tell' my meds kick in and I'll be damned if there isn't a way to make it read better! I hate that! :D

    Good stuff as always, JD :)
      J.D. Ray and Steve Rivers like this.
  4. Steve Rivers
    I do, too @Some Guy . I am simply too terrible at placing commas half the time, so it gives me reassurance.
    It's when you shove excerpts from popular novels into Gram and Hemmingway that you realize both of them should never be fully adhered to. Sometimes the most popular authors, even after a professional editing, have as many as a quarter to half the commas are missing that Gram says should be included. Mostly from dialogue. That and passive voice too. I NEVER follow its passive advice in dialogue. Passive is moronic to follow in speech due to 99.99999% of the English-speaking world not even knowing about it, and people use it in every-day speech in every other sentence.
    But now you got me going off on a tangent at my passive fury.
    What was I saying?
      Some Guy, J.D. Ray and Scoobyslippers like this.
  5. GrahamLewis
    I find that P.G. Wodehouse does an amazing job of creating characters and scenes and actions with few but effective words.
      Steve Rivers, Some Guy and J.D. Ray like this.
  6. Some Guy
    Written as spoken defines my characters without exposition, and prevents lecturing and monologuing. I am in character, so I don't write it if they won't say it. There should be a setting to ignore quotes. Comma inside quotes gauls me, no end. Single space after punctu infuriates me.
  7. Xoic
    Choosing synonyms doesn't change it from passive to active voice. 'Realizing' is just as passive as 'thinking'. Have you ever seen someone realizing? It's pretty dull. What you need to do when you find these telltales is dig deeper and strip away the screens or baffles between the reader and the action. Rather than write about people thinking things or seeing thing, just write about what's happening in front of them—the actions themselves.

    "They realized that seeing..." Both realizing (thinking) and seeing are extremely passive actions. You've nested one inside the other, creating double passivity. I would just write 'obviously carrying a heavy load down the street on a pole will draw too much attention...'—it's clear this is the thought of the character.

    Just give the thought itself directly to the reader, don't say that a character had the thought. And showing means showing the reader directly what you want them to see ,not telling them that a character saw it. Maybe this will make it clear—think about the difference between pointing out the window so someone can see a car crash, or simply telling them "I see a car crash out the window". The second one is telling them something, which carries no visceral impact, the first lets them actually experience it directly.
      Some Guy and J.D. Ray like this.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice