The Stories They Were

By GrahamLewis · Apr 18, 2018 · ·
  1. Thinking about fiction and creating characters has shown me something unexpected. I never noticed until recently how little I know about real people in my life. I think I know them, but so much of that is actually either my projection or filtered by the narrow lens of my own life. How many rich stories are out there for the hearing -- or taking -- if I could only pay more attention.


    Or had paid more attention. This lack of knowledge feels especially true with regard to people who have passed away. Sometimes I almost feel them nearby, as though they are reaching out to share with me. Chapters that are now closed. At least for now.


    For example, my late aunt, my father’s sister. I knew her only in the context of being my cousins’ mother, an adult figure to my child’s world, and later as one of several aging relatives. We got on fine, so far as I know, but I don’t think I ever asked her anything about her own life, aspirations, or feelings.


    One example, perhaps more poignant because of its banality, was her habit of rearranging her kitchen cupboards every few months, so that I could rarely find a drinking glass at first try. It became a standing joke between us, but I never wondered why she did it. Until now.


    As I look back, I see a woman raising a family in post-WWII midAmerica, in a house her carpenter/husband built from scratch. A solid house, but a small one and barebones one. My uncle would never consider moving to a larger one, or from midtown to the suburbs, as most people of that generation and class would have done. The house seemed big in my childhood years, and I was fascinated by the way so much was crammed in. But when I visited as an adult I realized how tiny was. And how unchanging. My uncle never wanted to change what wasn't broken, and then only for more bare bones.


    I imagine now that her minor kitchen rearranging was a chance to do something a bit creative in a limited context. Someone whose own dreams had been buried in her role. Or maybe that’s just my projection. I never asked her, or really bothered to look. (And yes, my uncle is the same situation. So much he might have said.)


    And so it goes with almost everyone I knew who is gone, or, for that matter, with almost everyone I know now. I’ve begun to see people around me as sparks of life, who carry around universes within themselves, some of which they would never want to share, some of which they would share if asked in the right context.


    Some of which is there for the seeing.


    I’m wondering if that’s what makes for the richest fiction -- not an imaginary world filled with projections of the author’s own imagination, but rather peopled with true and perceptive observations of real people around them, so that readers see themselves in the story, not some cardboard cutout or comic book world.

    The stories that really are -- or were.

Comments

  1. jim onion
    I had a similar realization. Part of it for me is that I was simply too young to recognize these things, or care to inquire. Sometimes there just never seemed to be a good moment or context to ask, or talk about anything that wasn't surface-level.

    I've tried to do this more with my friends, and it's worked to some degree. But with them the problem is sometimes that they may have never thought to ask themselves the questions in the first place.

    I struggle with characters in fiction. Taking a sincere look at the world around us ("write what you know") is good advice; trying to populate our stories with real observations, and people dressed in the costumes of characters. Do you have any other suggestions, by chance? I've thought about reading more Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, because I noticed - besides the fact that they are among the greatest writers of all time - their fiction is so "REAL", including their characters.
      Andrew Alvarez likes this.
  2. Andrew Alvarez
    I think it's a two-way relationship in between real life experiences and mind projections what makes the best fiction. To project is a natural response to the information flow from the other ones, and in the same way, people tend to project their own realities in unrealistic fashion. The building of fictitious character - at least successful ones - is tied to the set of projections that the author has collected along his life experiences, while real people use to live their day to day in a very 'magical' way.

    There is an advantage from 'cardboard' characters over real people for fiction: their ability to appeal towards universality on the experiences they project. Experiences from specific people tend to be restricted to real life circumstances to make sense, but the fictitious character has not such restrictions, and even if his circumstances are unbelievable, they have always a chance to appeal a sense of universal humanity and reasoning. That's why children's tales were and are more popular than biographic essays or historical narratives: they can condensate truth common to every human been, instead of setting particular events restricted by fact and circumstance.
      GrahamLewis and Foxxx like this.
  3. GrahamLewis
    I'm not sure I agree, Andrew. But maybe it's a matter of semantics. Or maybe I'm talking more religion or philosophy than writing. But what I think I have learned is that I have rarely experienced people beyond my own prejudices and projections, so have had difficulty describing characters who feel complete, alive. That's what I'm trying to learn to do.

    I think that the best characters I've read are rounded, have a feeling of being alive and mysterious in the way I see myself. By "cardboard" I mean 0ne-dimensional, cut out of an idea and propped up to prove a point or illustrate a role. Predictable, too. But I'd like to understand my characters as people, not as ideas, to have them be unpredictable, but in ways consistent with their personalities.

    Make sense? Or am I simply blathering as a result of this incessant, unending winter?
      Andrew Alvarez and Foxxx like this.
  4. jim onion
    @GrahamLewis I think you have a point, but there's something to be said about archetypes. While I do like to feel as if the characters are alive and "real", it's balanced with a sense of familiarity and predictability.

    Take characters like Indiana Jones and Han Solo. Besides key points in character development -- like when Han flies back in to save the day and officially aligns himself with the Rebels against the Empire -- they're pretty static and predictable. Doesn't mean they're not complex, of course.

    Even realist-literature like Anna Karenina has these to some extent. It's not the result of bad writing. It's important to recognize that these archetypes are fundamental to humanity, and it's difficult to escape them.
      Andrew Alvarez likes this.
  5. GrahamLewis
    Nothing "wrong" with archetypes. I think we are all manifestations of one archetype or another, or maybe a mix with one dominating. Few people are pure manifestations of evil (fortunately) and even fewer are untaintedly good. Plus there's the fact that often no one knows himself or herself or theirself until thrown into a situation. Or how others will react. Heroes or cowards or likely somewhere in between. Like people who resignedly went down on the Titanic vs, those who tossed others off life-rafts to save themselves.

    As CS Lewis wrote somewhere, if you turn on the cellar light and see rats, it wasn't the light that created the rats, it only illuminated them.

    I just know that if one should "write what you know," I've realized that I know very little about other people, so my characters tend toward being not archetypes but stereotypes. There's a difference.
      Foxxx and Andrew Alvarez like this.
  6. Krispee
    Interesting thoughts. We do tend to live in a bubble, it's my life so I'm going to live it. If we got our head up and looked, really saw, then the world might look a little differently.
    Work is an interestiing area. I'm of the opinion that if you work for someone then you work for someone, you don't spend all day talking or avoiding. I sometimes chat with my fellow workers, stop for a minute or two, then it's done and I'm back to work. I can honestly say that I don't necessarily know my fellow workers that well but then I sometimes find that I do. Little things that you suddenly remember that they said that spoke volumes.
    Perhaps we are looking for big things but forget it is often the little things, the little strokes, that paint the picture.
      Andrew Alvarez likes this.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice