I mean to say that this character likes danger, but I refuse to say : "James liked danger." The problem is, it still sounds like the most logical sentence to me! I mean it to say that he is drawn to it, rather than he likes it, which is what's making it harder, and I don't like "James was drawn to danger." It sounds too... unimpressive? I don't know... I thought about writing a longer sentence that explains it, but the pace of this specific paragraph is fast and straightforward. Or how about : "James was drawn to danger like moths to a flame"? What do you think of that? It's meant to make the reader go "Oh! He's interesting, I want to know more about him!" without sounding like I'm trying too hard to convince them. I know part of being a writer means finding different ways of dealing with that sort of thing on your own, but I'm having so much difficulty with this one! Maybe I'm just tired and finals are finally getting to me haha! (To give more details if anyone is interested, I don't mean 'fun' danger like ordering seafood at a sketchy restaurant instead of pasta, I mean doing things just to see what happens, getting into life-threatening situations out of pure curiosity and because you can, stuff like that... That's why "likes danger" doesn't work, because it makes it sound like he's just a guy who'd consider bungee jumping after college haha)
I think it depends on the style of your writing in general. Actually, both "James liked danger" and "James was drawn to danger like moths to a flame" could work in the right context. The first one is elegant in its simplicity. Would work for a story that describes the gritty reality of our world. The second one sounds a bit exaggerated, as if said slightly tongue-in-cheek. Would work for a text that uses irony a lot. "James was drawn to danger" is similar to "James liked" danger in style, but yes, it has another content. More like an uncontrollable urge than a voluntary decision. But of course, I'm not a native english speaker, so take my words with a grain of salt.
You can go lot's of directions: James was wholly unfamiliar with the idea of caution. (tell) As a child, a pair of scissors and a slippery roof was James' idea of fun. Still is. (show) James' mother still had nightmares regarding his boyhood antics. (show) Try to show his tendencies rather than just tell us.
If you really want the reader to be interested in James you'll probably do better if you show it. No matter how you phrase that sentence it's still a straight tell about an important character trait. Not that you can't do that here or there, but that's one of those things you should probably be showing.
Right, I probably should have mentioned that I've done that. The first paragraphs before this sentence are about how he was always drawn to dangerous things when he was a kid (without ever mentioning the word 'danger' and that it used to scare him, but now he chose to embrace it and allow it to become a part of who he is. The sentence goes right after that one, like I'm summering it up, like : "It (Danger) was no less a part of him than blablablabla. James was always drawn to danger, and something something. (end of the first introduction). Then we jump straight into the present. I want it to be told straightforward because I want it to be a bit shocking, and I also want the reader to remember. I want it to be clear, I don't want them to guess, since it's one of his biggest motivations and explains why he is the way he is. That way I'll never have to say it again, and they won't think about it specifically, but it'll always be at the back of their minds. Sorry if that doesn't make any sense, I'm not only tired but french which is equally terrible hahaha! Ah...
James was a danger addict, and today he was in withdrawal. Others: James craved danger. Danger had always been James' best friend. As a child, James was briefly obsessed with roller coasters. But when he realized that the train was never going to fall off the track, the love affair was over.
Do an antimetabole. You just reverse it all. It keeps it very simple and emphasizes your point: James liked danger. Danger liked James. You could boost the action if you needed. It can be stated a zillion ways: James thrived on danger. Danger thrived on James. Crazy Greeks thought of everything.
So i just learned a new word, antimetabole. I was thinking of found. Danger always/usually/often/easily found James.
I like @Seven Crowns's 'James thrived on danger', since thriving on something has more of a visceral impact than 'liking' or even being 'drawn to' it. I think that's what you want if you're going to be direct. But for the love of Dickens, avoid cliches like 'drawn like a moth to a flame'. Cliches that ubiquitous sound much duller than they have any right to. Offer the reader a comparison they haven't already heard loads of times; any original comparison you can come up with would be much more interesting: 'He chased danger like a dog after a squirrel.' 'Danger roped him in like a huckster.' 'Danger sent a thrill through James like a spark from a plug.' 'He couldn't resist the siren's call of danger.' 'A hint of danger hooked James like a thumb in his belt loop.' Nothing Shakespearean off the top of my head, but I promise that if you take a little time to think of things which attract/pull/pursue/etc., you can at least do better than tired old moths and flames.
If you say he's drawn to it but doesn't necessarily like it, the word "compelled/compulsion" is the first thing that comes to my mind. Or something to the "he knows better but does it anyway" effect.
The Moth to a flame might be a little trite, but I too struggle with clichés in a modern setting. Maybe: James' aura spoke danger. No that's no good. I think I like: He thrived on danger. It would have to be a tongue in cheek description of James, otherwise we would have deduced it by the description of the character.
I think the basic problem with 'moth to a flame', apart from the fact that cliches are bland by their nature, is that it's one of those figurative ideas that has less bearing on modern life. The image suggests the time and place to which it belongs, so it confuses the tone and setting. Figurative language can do more than one thing (describe a character), it should also fit the specific world that the characters live in. The image itself can reflect character. So from my examples, I'd think about the (not terribly original, but still much less over-used) 'spark from a plug' if James was a physical/kinaesthetic-intelligence type who likes messing around with things like mechanics, etc. A 'hooked thumb in a belt loop' would suggest a flirty, social kind of context, especially if James is an outgoing/'try anything once' type. When the images themselves suggest what the characters are like and/or what kind of stuff makes up their lives, the writing gets out of the straight 'telling' territory and starts to also 'show' things in the best sense of 'showing'. So as a general rule, if a cliche occurs to me when I'm writing but Googling the full line in quotes would yield thousands or hundreds of thousands of results (inputting "like a moth to a flame" yields 399,000+), I just take that as a hint that I can fit in some figurative language there (which can be tricky to find the right place for, especially in a casual contemporary genre/style) and try to come up with my own metaphor/simile based on the context.
I edited my point because I see it goes against your desire. I think you are wrestling with the style element instead of the content. Best wishes.
Yeah, if I were you I'd turn that one statement into, like, its own scene - without ever actually saying it. Gives you lots of opportunities for strong character (and inter-relationship) building.
If you do go with making it a statement, I'd not go with the moth-to-the-flame thing unless I wanted the reader to think he was dumb and suicidal. Maybe something like, "Battle was his brandy; glory was his chaser." (Obviously not an apt reference for the character, but you get the idea).
That's kind of clunky repetition though, you don't really want to have 'always all'. Plus having two 'it's and two 'was's in the same short sentence is kind of dull. Not the strongest sentence. Maybe: The problem is that the OP's thought 'James liked danger' is very simple, and making the sentence longer and more complicated won't make that thought more complex if it doesn't add anything. So if it's going to be written longer, the thought itself has to be expanded. That's why, as one solution, I'd suggest using figurative language to make the point and also create some imagery that adds to the story.
A good approach might be to broach it from the character's point of view. Why does the character favor danger? Does he simply not care? Does he want to be injured? Does he enjoy the risk? Does he not understand why he likes danger, but he merely know he does? Your "Moth to a flame" evokes the last. Many are daredevils (the third). If the character is depressed (unlikely the way you wrote it, but it would be the second), or does your character simply have a bit of an invincibility complex similar to modern teens (the first)? I get a feeling you're going for the daredevil approach. In which case, maybe add in something to the effect of how it makes him feel.
Yes. Telling us that James was drawn to danger, rather than creating an interesting image like James losing interest in roller-coasters because they never came off the track, isn't going to make the concept stick. A strong image will always make a concept stick. Just trotting out a phrase or a cliché probably won't. And if you've already shown the different ways James has been drawn to danger since childhood, that's probably enough. You might want to assume the reader will get this concept, and resist the urge to bang them over the head with it.
That might be best. It could be that I was just not satisfied with the way I was describing it, like it wasn't saying it enough. I've been struggling with this chapter for so long that I think I just wanted a magical answer to finally be able to move on, but that's where you go wrong, I think. I've tried something new (I talked about how his parents were terrified he'd find a way to get himself killed when he was a child. I like this much better.) Thanks for your ideas everyone. I feel like I grow so much with your answers. Writing in English is so new to me that it sometimes feels so obscure. There's so many things I don't know, it's nice to feel like I can always come here and people will actually do their best to help, and won't make fun of me for not knowing obvious things (like the moth to a flame thing, haha, it's been noted). Anyway thanks a lot! You're all amazing for taking the time to help me with this!
Let's found a "non-native english writers" club. ^ ^ Btw. my older brother climbed out of the window in the second floor at age 5 to see what his grandmother in the next room did. Talk about liking danger!