1. GlitterRain7

    GlitterRain7 Galaxy Girl Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2017
    Messages:
    639
    Likes Received:
    904

    A question on sequels

    Discussion in 'Traditional Publishing' started by GlitterRain7, Aug 19, 2018.

    Okay, so I'm seriously thinking about making my standalone novel have a sequel or possibly be the first book in a trilogy. If I was to do that, and I got this book traditionally published but they for whatever reason dropped the second book's production, could I go ahead and get the second and possibly third book self published? Is there anything where a traditional publisher would say you can't do that?
     
    jannert likes this.
  2. Laurin Kelly

    Laurin Kelly Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2016
    Messages:
    2,521
    Likes Received:
    4,054
    The original contract you signed would have to have legal verbiage claiming ownership to sequels, I would think.
     
    Shenanigator likes this.
  3. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,891
    Location:
    Scotland
    Just a question, stemming from your response, Laurin. If the publisher does get legal ownership of any sequels you write, does this mean they must publish them? Can they refuse to publish them, while still not allowing the author to publish elsewhere? Or is this an issue you must address while negotiating any contract for your first book (in the series?)
     
    Linz likes this.
  4. Linz

    Linz Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2018
    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    119
    Yeah, I was thinking that. It doesn't seem fair to the author for a publisher to claim ownership of sequels, and then decide not to publish them.
     
    GlitterRain7 likes this.
  5. BayView

    BayView Huh. Interesting. Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    10,462
    Likes Received:
    11,689
    This will all depend on the wording of the contract, but in general if the publisher pays an advance for the second (or third) books, the publisher is really, really unlikely to not publish it. But most contracts I've signed for multiple books have included language for reversion of rights if not published in a timely manner and/or if a certain number of copies aren't sold per year, so if the publisher decided not to publish the rest of the books despite having paid advances on them (again, unlikely), then the rights would eventually revert. There would likely be a delay in publishing the later books, but that's all.

    And if the publisher isn't paying an advance, the contract likely gives them right of first refusal or something similar, which only means they have the chance to form a contract to publish it, not that they control the rights forever.

    So, in summary:

    1. This will depend on individual contracts, but...

    2. If the contract is for multiple books, it's very likely multiple books will be published and there should be a reversion of rights clause, and

    3. If the contract is for a single book, there will probably be a clause about first refusal on sequels, and if the publisher doesn't want to publish the later books they'll just refuse and the author can do what she wants.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2018
  6. jannert

    jannert Retired Mod Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2013
    Messages:
    17,674
    Likes Received:
    19,891
    Location:
    Scotland
    Thanks. That makes sense.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice