1. Shadow Dragon

    Shadow Dragon Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,483
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    In the land of the gods

    Two questions about sentence structure.

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by Shadow Dragon, Oct 17, 2008.

    Ok, so as the title implies I have a couple questions to ask. First off is this sentence a fragment:

    As for the second question; Are sentence fragments ok to use in dialogue? I guess that it should be since people don't always talk in full sentences.
     
  2. Scarlett_156

    Scarlett_156 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Colorado USA
    The answer to the first question is "no" and the answer to the second is "yes". How else would your dialog be realistic if it didn't mirror the way people actually talk? (Unless you are writing a philosophical object-lesson, of course.) yours in Chaos, Scarlett
     
  3. DragonGrim

    DragonGrim New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Iowa
    “His hair (subject), black as a night on the new moon (adjective), went (verb) down to his waist (object)”


    No, your quote is not a fragment. Just remember that sentence fragments are a jolt: they need to be in context, and should be there for a reason, such as to emphasize something.
     
  4. DragonGrim

    DragonGrim New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Iowa
    Scarlett is right too: dialogue should seem realistic. Somewhat. Sort of.
     
  5. Shadow Dragon

    Shadow Dragon Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,483
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    In the land of the gods
    Thanks. I didn't think the first one was a fragment, but for some reason microsoft word thought it was.
     
  6. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    I have no idea how MS parsed that as a fragment. It definitely has something to do with the parenthetical phrase (black as a night on the new moon), because if you remove it, MSWord stops complaining. But the original sentence is correct and complete.
     
  7. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    and fragments are not just ok to use in dialog... judicious use of them also makes your narrative reader-friendly...
     
  8. architectus

    architectus Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,795
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Ca
    Because MS Word is stupid when it comes to fragments. It is easy to confuse.
     
  9. Little Miss Edi

    Little Miss Edi New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    214
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    South East, England
    So, is it decided that fragments are ok (within reason - although what that reason is probably eludes me too)?
     
  10. Rei

    Rei Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    7,864
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Kingston
    Fragments are essential in dialogue. We don't talk in full sentences. Used properly, they're also fine in narrative sometimes. Once a creative writer has mastered the rules of grammer, it is perfectly okay to break them on occassion.
     
  11. Scattercat

    Scattercat Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Under there.
    I suspect Word's spaz attack might be brought on by the missing "as." If we're being ultra-orthodox, the sentence should read, "His hair, as black as night, went to his waist."
     
  12. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Machine parsing of natural language, even well-formed sentences, is a very complicated matter that depends on the parser "understanding" some of the semantics (meaning) of the words used, in order to disambiguate alternatives.

    In formal language theory terms, natural languages are context-sensitive grammars, and the time required to parse valid sentential forms may in some cases be unbounded.

    I find it impressive that Word manages as well as it does with grammar analysis.
     
  13. Scattercat

    Scattercat Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Under there.
    Agreed. Unfortunately, it's wrong often enough that I tend to turn it off and rely on proofreaders instead. :)
     
  14. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Oh I leave it on. If it finds something legitimate, I correct it, otherwise I ignore it.

    As with spellchecking, I take a "belt and suspenders" approach. Let the tool find what it will, and correct it if it's a valid hit. Then do a proofread to catch what my human mind can pick up. There will still be mistakes, but hopefully relatively few of them by that time.
     
  15. Wreybies

    Wreybies Thrice Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,826
    Likes Received:
    20,815
    Location:
    El Tembloroso Caribe

    Therein lies the crux of the matter which Rei has so excellently stated. Random errors and bad grammar will appear as just that, random errors.

    In Miéville's Bas Lag series, there are characters known as Remade. These are individuals who, for punitive reasons, have had their bodies altered in grotesque ways. They live as slaves to the state.

    There is a renegade group of Remade who live as bandits and call themselves fRemade. Mieville writes their name just as I have presented it, lower case f followed by upper case R.

    This goes against all rules of capitalization which are considered correct, but in his books it makes for an effective presentation of how these individuals think of themselves. This effect would never work if the novel were simply filled with spelling errors. Mastery first, artistic license after.
     
  16. Scattercat

    Scattercat Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2008
    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Under there.
    Myself, I can't write with those doggone little green lines under everything. Drives me right up the wall.

    Quoted for truthiness.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice