Tags:
  1. chicagoliz

    chicagoliz Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    808
    Location:
    Pennsylvania

    Copyright and public domain

    Discussion in 'General Writing' started by chicagoliz, Dec 28, 2013.

    Here's an interesting article about copyright. Sherlock Holmes was just deemed to be in the public domain. Although anything in a story about him after 1923 is not. The general characters, though, are. Seems like there may be an argument here for a longer extension of copyright, especially when an author uses characters over a series of books?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/27/a-judge-just-gave-an-elementary-lesson-on-copyright-to-the-owners-of-sherlock-holmes/
     
  2. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    11,489
    Likes Received:
    5,674
    Location:
    California, US
    I think copyright is long enough already. More than long enough, really. People should be free to use these older characters if they want to.
     
  3. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,235
    Likes Received:
    1,015
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    if no one could use doyle's characters, we'd be denied the brilliant turn given holmes by benedict cumberbatch [yes, that's they guy's actual name--he's english, which explains a lot] in the nifty 'sherlock' series on bbc... and the fun switch on both sherlock and 'dr watson' given us by jonny lee miller and the always exceptional lucy liu, in american tv's 'elementary'... both of which i immediately became addicted to, on first sight...

    oh, and i guess i have to add robert downey jr's hollywood-hamburgered-up versions, as well, though i can't include those in the same class as the classier incarnations noted above...
     
  4. chicagoliz

    chicagoliz Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    808
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Perhaps that's why the article has that big picture of him ;-)
    (Actually it was funny he was featured -- I haven't seen Holmes, but just yesterday we watched the latest Star Trek movie, and he plays Khan. I asked my husband who he was, and he did not know -- he looked him up, and had a similar reaction to the name. Then I saw his picture prominently displayed on this article.)

    The dispute was more about payment to the estate, rather than a prevention of using the characters. (Although that certainly could be an issue.) But it raises an interesting idea about characters in a series and varying expiration of copyright for different aspects of a storyline that might take place within the series. I agree in this instance, that it seems like all the Sherlock Holmes characters are so ubiquitous that it certainly *seems* like they should be in the public domain, and in fact, they are, due to this recent expiration of copyright. But I had not really considered the implications of parts of a story that would be reused. I don't know for certain what I think yet.
     
  5. Thomas Kitchen

    Thomas Kitchen Proofreader in the Making Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    426
    Location:
    I'm Welsh - and proud!
    Britain does it again. :D
     

Share This Page