Copywork Exercise For Writers

Discussion in 'Articles' started by nastyjman, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:46 PM.

By nastyjman on Jan 12, 2018 at 10:46 PM
  1. nastyjman

    nastyjman Senior Member

    Sep 27, 2010
    Likes Received:

    Copywork Exercise For Writers

    Discussion in 'Articles' started by nastyjman, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:46 PM.

    I discovered copywork after listening to a podcast (I’m not sure what episode or which podcast it was from; to that, I apologize). I devote about 20 minutes on the exercise: I take a novel or short story and then copy it, word for word.

    That’s it.

    I rotate between three stories. Currently, I’m doing Stephen King’s IT, James Clavell’s Shogun and Brandon Sanderson’s Way of Kings. I then switch out a title once I’ve finished copying a chapter, either doing another novel or short story. When I’m reading a story and come across an engaging scene, I make note of the chapter and page so I can copy it after I finish reading the book (read for pleasure first; study it later).

    I started doing copywork because I was insecure on how I style my sentences. Often, when I’m writing on my manuscript, I worry that I’m using too much action and description, and not enough character thoughts and narrative intrusions. After doing some copywork, I began questioning the oft parroted rule “show, don’t tell.” Eventually I found that the rule must be broken: it is not “show, don’t tell,” it is “show and tell.”

    Novice writers tend to “tell” a lot. They overstay inside their character’s head, make the narrator intrude too much, and blabber on and on and on about the world they crafted. But once they take the advice “show, don’t tell” to heart, the novice writer will overdo it and is left with nothing but action and dialogue and description.

    Mistakes must be made, and the novice writer must learn. So I learned.

    Copywork made me understand that “showing” and “telling” is a spectrum. It is not about balance; it is about rhythm.

    There are seven narrative modes. I have listed them from concrete to abstract, from “showing” to “telling.”
    • Action
    • Dialogue
    • Description
    • Thought
    • Intrusion
    • Exposition
    • Summary/Transition
    The “showing” modes are action, dialogue and description. These are concrete. You see action, you hear dialogue, you sense what’s being described, like the smell of wet garbage or the taste of a lip-puckering lemon slice.

    In between “showing” and “telling” is thought. We are shown what the character is thinking, but the narrator is really telling us this since thoughts are intangible.

    The “telling” modes are intrusion, exposition, summary and transition. These are modes that belong to the narrator, who is an abstract entity of the author’s creation. It intrudes like a ghost, telling us something about the character, or what’s about to happen. Sometimes they’ll explain something that may or may not be relevant, but feel it’s important for the narrator to convey.

    So I do this copywork exercise for 12 minutes. Once I’m done copying, I’ll start highlighting clauses and phrases by their narrative mode, which usually takes less than 8 minutes.

    The following are the color-coding I use and a brief explanation why it’s colored that way.
    • Action as Red or Orange, like blood and explosions, the stuff associated with action movies.
    • Dialogue as nothing because you can easily identify it with quotation marks. If you’re doing copywork of Cormac McCarthy, who eschews quotation marks, then you can add those for your sake (and sanity).
    • Description as Green, like most of Mother Nature with her trees and grass and shrubberies.
    • Thought as Blue, like the sky where clouds float, which I associate with thought bubbles in comics (because they look like clouds).
    • Intrusion as Pink because Narrators are fabulous entities (the color choice was a personal thing).
    • Exposition as Gray because it’s a dull color.
    • Summary/Transition as Yellow, like the caution signal in traffic lights.
    Of course you can have your own color scheme that makes sense to you.

    Now that we have designated certain colors to their modes, we start highlighting. Look for clauses and phrases, not sentences alone. You will highlight the following:
    • Main Clauses
    • Subordinate Clauses
    • Absolute Phrases
    • Participial Phrases
    These are the main ones you should identify. I omitted Prepositional Phrases because they function as adjectives or adverbs.

    Let me explain, then, what the narrative modes are.

    Action is self-explanatory. If there’s movement, then it’s action. Keyword here is dynamic.

    Description can easily be discerned with the S-LV-C sentence construction (is, was, see, hear, smell, feel, taste, etc.). It can be identified with sensory verbs. Keyword here is static.

    Dialogue is pretty self-explanatory as well. If folks are talking in real-time, it’s dialogue.

    Thought has two types: direct and indirect. Direct are sentences with thought tags (I can't believe I broke my arm for that, he thought). Indirect are phrases or clauses without thought tags, but still attributable to a character’s thoughts (Jimmi remembered that time he broke his arm. He knelt down, wondering why he climbed that tree in the first place).

    Narrative Intrusion or Intrusion is when the narrator seems to address the reader.

    Often Indirect Thoughts and Intrusion are hard to discern. If it comes to that, my rule is this: if the character may think it at the moment, then it is Thoughts. Otherwise it is Intrusion. For example:

    Jim stopped to look at the grotesque painting. It made his skin prickle, and if he had a knife handy, he would have stabbed the canvas and ripped it open. ​

    In the second sentence and second clause (if he had a…), Jim might be thinking this or imagining it. Or the narrator could be relaying this thought to us without Jim being aware or conscious of his impulse. But since it’s possible that Jim might think it, we’d label this as a thought.

    Same example, but as Intrusion:

    Jim stopped to look at the grotesque painting. It made his skin prickle, and if he were an art appraiser, he’d be at awe of what he was seeing--then lose his mind. Fortunately, he was a janitor. ​

    Here, the narrator intrudes, giving their own thoughts that if Jim were an appraiser. We can assume that Jim is not thinking this because he’s not an art appraiser. The narrator is predicting what Jim’s reaction would be if he were. On the last sentence, the narrator intrudes once more, telling us that he’s fortunate he was a janitor, implying that his sanity was saved.

    Another thing that a narrator can do is look into the future that the character would not be aware of. For example:

    Jim stopped to look at the grotesque painting. If he hadn’t looked at it, then he would have been safe from the curse that would kill him in ten days. ​

    On the second sentence, the narrator intrudes, giving the reader a hint of what’s to come. Dramatic Irony is always an Intrusion. Dramatic Irony is when the reader knows more than the characters, thanks to the narrator giving that info. On the example above, the reader knows that Jim will be cursed, but Jim is not aware of it yet.

    Exposition or Info Dump is the narrator giving you a lecture. If Intrusion is intimate, then Exposition is cold. In Intrusion, the narrator is subjective, biased or opinionated towards the subject. In Exposition, the narrator is objective, detached or fact-based.

    Jim stopped to look at the grotesque painting. It was made in 1723 by Johann Mayorga, who had used virgin blood for the reds and charred bone for the blacks. Jim shivered at the sight of it. ​

    On the second sentence, a fact has been relayed to us. This is a quick exposition. The following is an info dump:

    Jim stopped to look at the grotesque painting. It was made in 1723 by Johann Mayorga, who had used virgin blood for the reds and charred bone for the blacks. The canvas, though mistaken with real cloth, was made of stretched and dried human skin. When the authorities eventually discovered his macabre hobby, they had found thirteen canvasses, all dried and ready to be painted on. His brushes . . . ​

    Too much information could rob the reader of some intrigue and mystery. It is good practice to sprinkle it in bite-sizes unless you want to elicit an emotion from info dumping. But it can become tedious. Veteran authors are adept with info dumping; novices use too much that it becomes suffocating.

    Summary are sentences or paragraphs that speeds up time. If Action or Dialogue is being portrayed, but not in great detail, then it is Summary. Transitionals are usually subordinate clauses that marks a jump in time or change in location, thus changing from one scene to another.

    Why go all through this, you ask?

    It’s a good exercise, I think. Musicians do covers of other successful musicians, and from doing so, they learn scales, techniques and also styles. We imitate to learn, and we innovate from what we learn.

    Another benefit is having a place for your notes and analysis. I don’t write on my books (I still see them as sacred), so having the capability to add comments on certain passages is great.

    And there you have it. I devote 20 minutes on this exercise. Nothing more. Time is precious, and as writers, we need to work on our own stuff (and read other people’s stuff).

    So, fellow writers, copy away!
    Seven Crowns and GB reader like this.


Discussion in 'Articles' started by nastyjman, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:46 PM.

    1. jannert
      I think that's a very interesting approach. My only concern would be copying ...the typing itself. I find when I'm copy-typing, I'm not actually thinking about what I'm typing, I'm simply typing words and trying not to make typos. I can easily whack through a whole page, typed perfectly, and not be able to tell you what it was all about.

      Have you got a way to get past that problem? If you do, then I totally applaud this method. It's similar to just reading mindfully, but more intense.

      I also would like to add one more thing to your narrative list ...and it's an intangible one. It's 'inference.' In other words, while an aspect of the story is not explicitly said, it can still be implied. And the reader should be able to pick it up, without being directly 'told.'

      How to do that is tricky, sometimes. If the hints are too strong, the story can become either preachy or predictible. If the hints are too obscure, the reader can miss the implication, and can also miss the point of the story. It's important to steer the reader in the direction you want them to go. If you can discover inference points in the story you are analysing other words, pinpoint where 'doubt' or 'insight' begins to enter the reader's head ...then that's a helpful thing to keep in mind when writing.

      Good job of getting us to become more aware of what we're doing, when we write. Studying how others do it can certainly create lightbulbs of inspiration.
      nastyjman likes this.
    2. GB reader
      GB reader
      Most interesting. I know I should try this, but I am lazy so probably it will stay with the thought of doing it.
      Still, the thought will stay with me forever.


      Looks like I posted this wrongly, the moderator should just remove it.
      Last edited: Jan 13, 2018 at 11:26 AM
    3. nastyjman
      I think you can copy it by hand as well if it works for you. But I did notice the difference between methods, and I think copying it by hand is more intimate. It is why I added highlighting in my typing routine. Actively highlighting the modes and also adding commentary brings me close to the work.

      I didn't mention typing or handwriting in the article because I believe both methods are valid. I think it comes down to preference. I type it out because I don't have highlighters handy and my hand cramps when I get too excited.

      As for Inference, I did encounter that in one of my copywork sessions. I categorized it as Intrusion since the Narrator withheld information from the reader.
      Last edited: Jan 13, 2018 at 5:20 PM
      jannert likes this.
    4. jannert
      I'll maybe try the handwriting thing. I can see where that might be better for me, in that handwriting isn't quite so technical. I would need to be thinking about the meaning and the words rather than the letters and punctuation marks. It's funny that I can type freely when I'm writing, and am thinking all the time about what I'm typing. But as soon as I start to copy something, it all gets technical.

      As far as inference goes, I didn't mean deliberately withholding something from the reader, or keeping it a secret, or stepping outside the story to intrude as an author. I meant deliberately shaping the writing so the reader picks up an inference that isn't being directly said. In the real world, I would call these 'hints.' Such as when you say to a visitor who has outstayed their welcome: "Gosh, it's getting dark out there already," when what you mean is "I think it's time you headed for home."
      nastyjman likes this.

Share This Page