Cum troughs and physics

Seriously, this is bugging me. I just can't see it unless maybe it was a particularly fruitful ejaculation onto a particularly flat stomach. Otherwise, my knowledge of gravity and fluid dynamics suggests this part of the anatomy is unlikely to work as trough.

This is where being anti-porn is a disadvantage in life.

Do you think we can get funding for an experiment? I would like to nominate Isha Blaaker's cum troughs for our study, which should not be double-blind because I wanna watch. It's science so it's okay.

 

Fine. Nobody talk science with me.

 

I didn't see this post... I guess we don't get notifications of new posts that just show up in the group, but... I don't think I even saw it in the general "New Posts" area - I'm pretty sure I would have noticed a thread with the phrase "Cum Troughs" in it...

In the name of science I did a google search for the phrase... it doesn't seem super-common, so maybe I just picked it up in a particularly un-scientific and tiny milieu?

I was amused, though, to read a discussion of Shakespeare's Richard III with the line "The image of the trough can be read as both reproducing and transfiguring that of the coffin-cum-trough at the Greyhound Inn." A coffin cum-trough is even more hard to picture.

 

I asked a couple of male friends about it and they also didn't understand the physics, although they are straight. And then they both said they had to go and I haven't heard from them since...

 

Did they go TOGETHER?

 

So, as a boy... (God, am I really going to type this? Yes, I am.)

No, it doesn't make sense that the V lines of the Apollo's Belt would serve as cum troughs. If anything it would be the ridges of my six pack that would be the most likely troughs given the direction of things.

Also, you have to hit the "watch" option on these threads to get a notice. This whole Groups thing is a like a little pocket universe. The laws of physics would seem to differ herein.

 

So if there's a new thread, there's no way to hit "watch" on it before you've seen it, right? Like, there's no way to just set the entire group to "watch" automatically?

And, re. troughs... I assume these are overflow troughs for when the six-pack troughs are already full and spilling out... naturally...

 

I set the whole 'forum' to watch and I didn't get a notification about this thread.

 

But it's your thread - maybe you wouldn't have?

How do you set the whole forum to watch?

 

Sorry, I meant I didn't get a notification about Wreybies' thread.

I'm not telling you. Assistant admins don't need to know.

 

Your cruelty is noticed, and a demerit has been recorded. In PERMANENT ink.

 

I think I may have seen some bukake porn where this might be possible due to the uh...volume, so to speak.

 

--vomit--