1. lameri

    lameri New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SF Bay Area

    Dates

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by lameri, Apr 28, 2011.

    What do you prefer, with or without commas? (I know it's not the standard: March 25, 2002)

    1) ... a title that never changed after 25th of March 2002
    2) ... a title that never changed after 25th of March, 2002.

    I found evidence to support both, but would be glad to hear if some style manuals recommend one over the other.
    Thank you!
     
  2. Arathald

    Arathald New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2011
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    17
    Location:
    Seattle
    Definitely the second, though both sound funny to me. Perhaps "the 25th of March, 2002"? Is there a specific reason you're choosing not to use the much more common and colloquial "March 25th, 2002"? What is the more general context of this? Is this a research paper, narration in a story, character dialogue, something else entirely? The whole phrase sits a bit uneasily with me.
     
  3. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    don't know why you're using such an odd construction... making more sense and reading more easily would be the simpler version below:

     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice