1. Published on Amazon? If you have a book, e-book, or audiobook available on Amazon.com, we'll promote it on WritingForums.org for free. Simply add your book to our Member Publications section. Add your book here or read the full announcement.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  1. Frip

    Frip New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0

    Possessive of a placename that is already a possessive

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by Frip, Sep 10, 2010.

    Hi,

    An area of town is called "St Peter's".

    Is "St Peter's bygone days" correct?

    I can't see what else it could be.

    Thanks,
    Frip.
     
  2. Melzaar the Almighty

    Melzaar the Almighty Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    55
    Location:
    UK
    I'd just wiggle around it, to be honest - "the bygone days of St Peter's" :p
     
  3. Frip

    Frip New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    I thought about that, but it's in a headline in a newsletter and I don't have the space.
     
  4. Melzaar the Almighty

    Melzaar the Almighty Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2010
    Messages:
    1,792
    Likes Received:
    55
    Location:
    UK
    If "St Peter's Bygone Days" is the whole extent of the title, change the emphasis, maybe: "St Peter's: Bygone Days"?
     
  5. PurpleCao

    PurpleCao Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    46
    Likes Received:
    0
    Surely if the name is already possessive, it doesn't need to be changed for a possessive context?

    Take off the top of my head the example word 'Chinese'. This is both a singular and plural word. You wouldn't say 'Chineses', so St.Peter's wouldn't change either, surely?
     
  6. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,316
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    that's not the same thing at all, pc...

    yes, frip... to make sense, you'd have to make it a double possessive if you worded it that way, so you should word it differently... the colon suggestion is a good one, but i don't see why the addition of one tiny word ['of' only... 'the' is not needed'] would matter in a newsletter headline, which can be as long as you want to make it...
     
  7. art

    art Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,159
    Likes Received:
    114
    If you are constrained and must use the formulation, I would just go with

    St Peter's'

    No clue whether this might be regrded as technically incorrect, though I fancy you won't have many complaints.
     
  8. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,316
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    that would be correct punctuation, but looks a bit awkward, so may confuse some readers...

    the best thing would be to avoid having to make the possessive possessive altogether, with better wording...
     

Share This Page