Before anyone says it. I sort of recently asked about this or what I am about to ask. I opened a new thread because I am curious in a different way and I think that framing makes this valid. Three legal-ish questions. Before I was curious how our law would interupt them, but now? I am just curious what you guys think. In every normal extension of the term. Like, do you like the premise that a character is in the following situation? Do you think she should burn for it? Wish more people in real life behaved this way? Or if you read this, would you be turned off by it? Would it interest you? That sort of stuff. I guess since I am not asking them as questions anymore. The three scenarios are this. 1. A legal woman, drops the charges against a man accused of a crime because a witness came forward claiming he is innocent. There was still enough evidence to take it to trial. She dropped it simply because she trusted the witness and she trusted the witness based on the fact that the witness has a close personal relation ship with her foster daughter. 2. Her foster daughter has commited a crime(Murder) She believes this is true. Yet she has no way to prove it. The method to which she discovered this would not in any meaningly way be able to even take this to trial. So in that reality the woman does nothing. Tells no one. And takes zero action towards getting her daughter arrested. If she had the chance, she would also be torn. She would rather help her daugther(foster or otherwise) but lacks the position to do such. So she stays out of it. 3.The circumstances behind the death of her foster daughters real mother are very unclear. So the woman actively took steps to hide them further. To the point of not exposing that her foster daughter is related to the dead woman. Her reasons are this. The dead mother had a large fortune that was slowly being given to charity. The woman here knew of people(literally, remember she is a lawyer) that would have the assests turned to them if the death became known. So in this act she willfully and knowling denied the people in question here access to funds that would otherwise be theirs. She did so to keep it in the hnads of charity though.