1. Hublocker

    Hublocker Member

    Mar 27, 2018
    Likes Received:

    Real place names?

    Discussion in 'Setting Development' started by Hublocker, Jul 11, 2019.

    I'm working on editing a draft of a novel I have set mostly in my old home town.

    From the setting on northern Vancouver Island on Canada's West coast, it is obvious from my description of the town and neighbouring towns where it is.

    I intend to change the name of the main town, but I was wondering if I should change all the others too, or should I just risk it and use the real place names.

    Right now Port Hardy has been changed to Nelson Bay, but I kept Alert bay, Port McNeill and Holberg as real names.
  2. Matt E

    Matt E Ruler of the planet Omicron Persei 8 Supporter Contributor

    Sep 7, 2014
    Likes Received:
    Yeah, if it's a small town I'd change the name, change some details of the town to fit the story, and keep some nearby place names (especially larger cities).
  3. deadrats

    deadrats Contributor Contributor

    Jul 7, 2016
    Likes Received:
    I would keep all the names the same. Real details ground fiction in a way other things can't. So, even if this is the inclusion of small-town living, something about it rings true. Why change any of the names?
    Cave Troll likes this.
  4. jannert

    jannert Super Moderator Staff Supporter Contributor

    Mar 7, 2013
    Likes Received:
    I'd say change the name of the main location. Otherwise you'll have people pouring out of the woodwork to tell you that certain streets don't exist in that town, or Maple Street runs parallel to Crapo Street, and there isn't any number 228 on it. They will also be quite determined to figure out who your characters are based on, and this can get you in some bother if you're not careful.

    People from small towns HATE it when their town is depicted 'wrongly.' I know. I'm from a small town.

    If it were me, I'd definitely change the name of the main town where the story takes place. That way you can create anything and anybody you want—including the town's history. You can also retain pertinent details from your real locale, and nobody can complain because you're claiming it's fiction. If you set a story in a 'real' place, folks who know the place will be constantly looking for errors and anomalies. Folks who don't know the place won't care what you call it.

    I'd say keep the neighbouring towns intact, if you want, especially if the only things that happen there are things that really COULD happen there. Such as your characters drive to one of these nearby towns to go to a movie, at a theatre that really exists, then go across the street for a drink afterwards in a bar that really exists, etc. But be careful, again, about making people or situations too recognisable.
    Last edited: Jul 19, 2019 at 9:04 PM
    AndieBoDandy likes this.
  5. AndieBoDandy

    AndieBoDandy Member

    Jun 21, 2019
    Likes Received:
    I am doing something similar. My main city is fictitious, an amalgamation really, of a couple of cities I am familiar with. However, we have such cool names for surrounding towns that I am keeping most of them.
  6. Cave Troll

    Cave Troll Loved by a Sweet lady. :) Supporter Contributor

    Aug 8, 2015
    Likes Received:
    Where cushions are comfy, and straps hold firm.
    With small towns, I would keep the names, since no one outside of them
    really know of them (and in my case believe they are real in the first place).
    Even in my first novel I used a small village in Siberia that is real (along with
    several moons that exist in our solar system, and in my sequel real places on
    Mars.) So keep it unless it is a really common town name, but even then it
    can still add some weight to the story, unlike fabricating a fake one in a real
    country. :)

Share This Page