I've always had a problem with how Missouri, at least, handles red light camera, and have hoped someone would take this up in the courts. My problem was that the State shifted the burden of proof to the vehicle owner, and under the Constitution the burden of proof rests with the State. That's at least part of the reason they've now been found Unconstitutional here: http://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=90869 What do you guys think of such cameras? Do they reduce accidents or are they primarily a revenue stream? Missouri may well come back with a modified statute to try to get around some of the deficiencies pointed out in this case.