I'm amazed that I'm about to say this: My editing is going really well. What usually happens is that I get frustrated and end up doing a lot of hacking and slashing (which can create problems with transition and flow) but, on this occasion, I seem to be more in control of myself and my thought processes. It helps that I've already trimmed the fat. A lower word count than usual for a short of mine, it's starting to read quite well, if I'm any judge.
But... and this is where I always start second-guessing myself; I like it. Will anyone else?
In the past, my main bones of contention have been flow, pacing and a narrator who just couldn't stop making commentary on the unfolding events. When these points came up in critique, some I understood well enough, and some (like my narration) completely escaped me. I couldn't see at the time what the big deal was, but I've always been a bit slow on the uptake. Suffice to say that now I see my failings all too clearly and my competition piece is an attempt to turn them around and make positives from negatives.
For example: My narrator can opine as much as he likes. I've written the piece in First Person. His thoughts and feelings on the unfolding subject matter make up the crux of my story. The story itself can be summed up in a sentence. There's nothing clever or remarkable about it, it's just day-in-the life fare, so I'm hoping the telling will be amusing enough to keep eyes on the text.
When all is said and done, I'm giving it my best shot, and that's all any of us can hope to do.
Comments
Sort Comments By