What About... The Story

By Some Guy · May 30, 2019 · ·
  1. (this is stolen from (Richach?) blog, but it was written by me in a comment there. I place it here, so I won't forget the trane-of-thought. This should probably be its own thread.)

    Art is an expression that produces a reaction. That's all I remember from my Art 101 class in college.
    So, fiction is art.
    I too am frustrated with the academic process of producing that reaction. It seems to rub against our nearly genetic oral tradition. Telling a story was a performance, an experience shared with the audience. They could see your face, gestures, and hear intonations. The storyteller enjoyed the interaction. In writing, that is lost. Try singing a song in writing. Lost. You can convey reactions and emotions, but you'll never hear music.
    Even if your writing succeeds in producing a reaction, you rarely know it other than sales or reviews. Most of us never get that far.
    Sometimes, it seems like all we have is each other, yet each other seems more of a guild than a platform. "In order to be recognized, you must be one of us." Our cry for attention is answered by a litany of hoops to jump through.
    Then we come to the Interwebs, the kindergarten playground. A battlefield, the soul-crushing grinder of our pleas and dreams, for the entertainment of the cruel and brutal.
    But what about the story? How do we know if our idea is worthy of attention before we jump through the hoops and turn our souls over to the Guild?
    What about the story?
    powseitch, alees, SkinnyPuppy and 5 others like this.

Comments

  1. Maverick_nc
    We don't. But we say 'fuck it', and write the damn thing anyway.
    Writing is one of those things that sounds easy to anyone who's not a writer. The creative part is fun sure, but the re-writing, editing and vacant staring at blank pages that go along with it certainly aren't. It's a passion that induces self doubt and we need to recognise and overcome it.

    I still think you should write a memoir. I might just keep banging on at you until you start one :D
  2. GrahamLewis
    Writing is simply another form of story-telling, with its own set of principles that make it work or not work. Oral story-telling also has its principles, and the good oralists work as hard at their craft as writers do. I agree that there is an immediacy to oral stories, but simply getting feedback doesn't always mean one knows what to do with it. Surely you've heard someone drag out a story interminably (or end it with, "you had to be there"), or maybe you've become aware you might be boring someone but don't know what to do with it.

    On the other hand I know of oral storytellers who move me with their work, just as I know of writers that do the same.

    In every case, merely having an idea for a story is only the first stage.

    Things like this writing forum offer opportunities to get almost immediate feedback long before you send anything out to be published (if you don't use a good one, like this one, you should). I imagine that oral storytellers also get feedback as they go along, long before they go on stage.
      Aerek_Of_Augustine and Some Guy like this.
  3. Some Guy
    Thanks for the response :) A bit of encouragement, a bit of pep-talk, a bit of reality. A healthy perspective. :)

    Still, the official question itself begs an answer, "What about the story?"

    Think tanks, clatches, pubs and poker games have solidified or fleshed out or furthered the 'idea' into the atomic bomb, or even the better mouse-trap. But we're here, not there. I prefer the company here, honestly, btw. :)
  4. GrahamLewis
    I honestly don't understand the issue here. How does developing and implementing the craft of effective writing interfere with or undermine any story? I understand a few grammatical rules may seem, and may be, anachronistic and frustrating, but those are few, and can usually be safely ignored or easily fixed (I been known to a preposition ending a sentence with). The rest really are time-tested principles that make for better, easier, more effective writing. No matter how "good" a story is (and the truth is we all have great stories in theory and in our heads), it can't be told effectively in, say, clunky sentences, weak grammar, and unclear or randomly changing points of view. It just can't.

    And yes, I know there are works out there that flaunt various principles. But (and yes I'm beginning a sentence with "but" because I think it's effective) those works that are known were done by master writers who have shown they know the basic principles and for deliberate reasons have chosen to ignore or contradict some of them. Few if any of us have the ability or track record to make that sort of thing work. And in fact, I hate most of those works, not because of the rules/principles issue, but because I hate trying to read them.
    .
    Almost every principle of effective writing is there because it makes writing better. And the better the writing, the better the story is told, and the more likely an agent, and then the readers, will be likely to read it.

    That's just the way it seems to me. And it makes sense to me.
      Some Guy likes this.
  5. Some Guy
    Wow! Lol
    I was commenting sarcastically on human behavior. Who in the world could declaim writing, when you'd have to write it anyway? No, the issue isn't about writing or rules and conventions. It's always about people. It's always about communication. For an example, I give you a parable:

    A small child walks up to a man and shows him a crude crayon drawing of a man and a car.

    "It's terrible" the man says, "there's no proportion. How's the man supposed to get in a car with no doors? Come back when you're a better artist!"

    The child walks away, sad. The man turns - and gets hit by the car.

    (more to say, I have. meditate upon this, I will)
  6. GrahamLewis
    Okay, I think I get it. You're saying that people see or read or hear what they are concerned with, not necessarily what the other is trying to communicate.

    Like in a Wooster story, Bertie Wooster is getting off a boat onto a small island. Jeeves mentions that he's heard that there is a swan couple nesting nearby. Bertie says it's no time for a wildlife discussion and Jeeves says, "very well, sir." Bertie gets onto the island and the male swan bursts out of the shrubbery and attacks him. Bertie had totally missed the context of the Jeeves comment, which was meant to be a warning.

    Of course even there the burden was on Jeeves to make it clear. He could have simply started with, "By way of warning, sir . . . ." Of course then the story would have suffered.
      Some Guy likes this.
  7. Some Guy
    Absolutely true, but the child has no experience or judgement, only innocence and sincerety. Onus cannot be shifted on newbies, otherwise we become cynical, like Jeeves. Can't ask if y'all want to be like Bertie, he's swan-poo, and my guy is road-pizza! Wonder if the swan is still hungry... o_O
  8. The Mink
    As well as being a write, I am also a reader.
    I read the stories as I write them (and also re-read them) - by the time I've third drafted a story it has been read many many times.
    so even if I am the only person to read something, it is still art - it still evokes a reaction (in fact I am often the perfect reader)
      Some Guy likes this.
  9. SkinnyPuppy
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice