1. TheSilverBeetle

    TheSilverBeetle Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California

    Pacing question.

    Discussion in 'Plot Development' started by TheSilverBeetle, Mar 10, 2012.

    So when writing a novel about how long does it usually take for the pace to really pick up? I mean do you prefer to begin by concentrating on back story and character development or do you like to pick things up from the get go? I am working on a novel and I am not too far but feel like things should really start to pick up but feel it may be to soon. Thoughts?
     
  2. Mallory

    Mallory Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,267
    Likes Received:
    199
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    I need conflict from the get-go. My main plots start kicking off by chapter 2, but there's still conflict in chapter 1 to keep people hooked. I usually start with character-based conflict so that I can characterize and be intriguing at the same time. I can't stand books that infodump in a huge diatribe, and usually don't maintain interest in them. If a book does this, that backstory had better be REALLY interesting (and either way, infodumping in the beginning is not good novel writing).

    Hope this helps.
     
  3. TheSilverBeetle

    TheSilverBeetle Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    It actually really did, thank you for responding so quickly.
     
  4. Phoenix Hikari

    Phoenix Hikari New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2012
    Messages:
    327
    Likes Received:
    7
    Yeah, it's always good to start with a conflict, it keeps the reader interested. Things should start picking up as soon as possible or the reader might start loosening up and probably put the book down.

    I usually try and write in a way I'd like to read it, given I was the reader. It's not as easy as it sounds, specially if you're too wrapped up in the plot. In the prologue of my current novel it seems I have put vague information, simply because I wanted it to sound mysterious, the people who read it were more confused than interested.
     
  5. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    I try to introduce my main character and get him motivated to do something (anything - it doesn't have to be his main motivation in the story) on page one. Soon after, say by page three or four, I want the main story to start. My MC has to have his main motivation, his main problem; the situation that puts him into the story has to be there.

    I used to love doing long setup sections at the beginning, full of beautiful descriptions and backstory, but I got cured of that pretty quickly when I took some Gotham online writing courses. Almost all of the critique I got on my early stories said things like "You write really well, but I think you should trim the beginning quite a lot. It takes a long time to get the story started." I mean, almost everybody said that. In my later stories, I got things going faster and that kind of criticism went away.

    I learned my lesson. Don't bother with excess setup and backstory. Get your MC established and get your story going right away.
     
  6. killbill

    killbill Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2012
    Messages:
    551
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    where the mind is without fear...
    When you feel the need to have a lot of backstories in the beginning you should re-examine if what you have started with is the right beginning. For example, you start a story with an abused teenage girl lying in a hospital bed and telling us how she ended up in that situation. Now instead of that, you may be better off starting the story with an abuse scene and then the hospital. As for descriptions, I usually scatter them all over the story. Apart from the obvious uses of descriptions, I usually use them to control the pace.

    Replying to your question, bringing in the conflict can never be too soon. Sooner the better.
     
  7. jazzabel

    jazzabel Agent Provocateur Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    4,255
    Likes Received:
    1,688
    The best books, for me, are the ones with relevant action from the get-go. Backstory is easily weaved into the narrative later, without compromising the pacing in the beginning. I also always start with action when I write, it makes for a more gripping read, I think.
     
  8. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    Always write story, not back story. Don't instruct your readers with the background. Just tell the story. Let the background leak into the story where it's needed, and not before.

    Begin where the story is already moving along. There may be times where you want to start in the easy times before the main action, but you still want to involve the reader early. So you can begin with a minor crisis unrelated to the main action, for the purpose of helping the reader get to know the characters.

    Be a shark. Start swimming, and never stop. When you stop moving forward, you die.
     
  9. Elgaisma

    Elgaisma Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2010
    Messages:
    5,319
    Likes Received:
    97
    I think it depends on the story. Mine often start with action (father and son arguing, throwing an alarm clock, two men together in a cupboard, having a picnic, a trip to the seaside or woods etc), however my current work has started with reflection and back story.

    For me the first paragraph is for introducing the main character and adding a little hint at the story ahead. My favourite novel to read starts with three pages of backstory.

    For my current work in progress I gave seven readers the choice between two paragraphs one with back story and one with current story. Everyone chose the back story and said it was gripping.
     
  10. Afion

    Afion New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Shropshire, UK
    The important thing is that you know your MC's backstory. You don't have to tell your reader all of it.
     
  11. TheSilverBeetle

    TheSilverBeetle Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2012
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    Thanks guys, I found the way to keep my book going. Thanks for the help guys!
     
  12. skeloboy_97

    skeloboy_97 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Australia
    Yeah, I pretty much agree with what the others say, conflict and action is great right from the start. It keeps them involved and wanting to read on.
     
  13. Tesoro

    Tesoro Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,818
    Likes Received:
    300
    Location:
    A place with no future
    I prefer my stories to start right when the "action" starts, because otherwise I get bored. :D One of my biggest fears (as a writer) is writing boring stories. Therefor I always try to start where the actual story takes off.
     
  14. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    ditto all that!

    the pace should never have to pick up... a good story starts out with a hook and never lets the readers wriggle free, by keeping the story flowing along too fast for them to escape...
     
  15. The Tourist

    The Tourist Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    Wisconsin.
    I'm worried about pacing, myself. The conflict for most of the story is the inner vacillating by the lead. The main 'action,' if you will, lasts slightly over 6 minutes real time from his point of view.

    Another violent act gets the lead fired. The personnel hearing lasts many times longer than the act itself.

    To me, it's a mix of cause, effect, cause, effect, and it works. The trouble is the actual time of the reading. I hate to just give into bloodletting to keep it a page-turner.
     
  16. superpsycho

    superpsycho New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    637
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    It's not so much a matter of conflict for me but keeping it interesting. You have to build a foundation to the story and characters at some point. Rather then do it all at once I try to weave it into the story a little at a time as the details become pertinent. I try to create questions in the mind of the reader then provide answers along the way hopefully keeping the reader interested.
     
  17. The Tourist

    The Tourist Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2012
    Messages:
    1,081
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    Wisconsin.
    Good, because that's what I did. I just don't like a lot of head-chopping and car crashes.
     
  18. Endovert

    Endovert New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Magrathea
    Aren't those questions usually related to the conflict of at least one character, though? Because if the questions don't pertain to the characters' desires/conflicts, it seems like they either wouldn't have interesting answers or you're writing nonfiction. I'm not trying to be antagonistic; I'm just wondering if it's all the same thing. Maybe I'm just in search of the Grand Unified Theory of Character/Reader Interaction, ha.
     
  19. marcuslam

    marcuslam New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    3
    I would fight the shark :D.

    Jokes aside, indeed, it's good to keep moving forward rather than backward. And yes, conflict can never show up soon enough. It needs to be natural, though. If a particular story warrants a slow start, go for it. There's nothing worse than explosions for the sake of explosions.
     
  20. Just Jon

    Just Jon New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2012
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Slightly left of center
    Definitely start "in the middle of it".

    I'm more of reader than a writer at this point, so I try to write how I like to read. When I pick up something off the shelf, I read the first page. If it starts with a giant descriptive paragraph, I put it back and look for something else. This may make me a bit uncouth, but it's what I am. ;)

    I think you hit the nail on the head when you said "but feel like things should really start to pick up". If you feel that way, chances are that readers will feel the same way too. So get on with it! :)
     
  21. superpsycho

    superpsycho New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    637
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    I figure you have to grab the reader in the first three paragraphs otherwise they'll pick up something else. I know I will if a book hasn't showed me something by that time.
     
  22. mammamaia

    mammamaia nit-picker-in-chief Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    19,150
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Location:
    Coquille, Oregon
    this is not always the best way... it may work well for many stories, but some do better starting at the beginning... or the end...

    there's never just one way to do things in writing... and each story needs to be dealt with on its own terms, not follow just one person's idea of what they happen to think is 'best'...
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice