Tags:
  1. WritersBlockParty

    WritersBlockParty New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2017
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    2

    The Word "to"

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by WritersBlockParty, Nov 30, 2017.

    Hi, first-time poster :)

    I have a tentative sentence with which I've been struggling. Hope I'm in the right section for such matters?

    It's as follows: "She tried to transform the fast-food industry and [to?] challenge some of the most fundamental assumptions about those who work in it."

    My question essentially boils down to is that second "to" necessary? Idk the rule here, if there is one. Sounds a little redundant with it, sounds a little informal without. Thank you so much.
     
    Seven Crowns likes this.
  2. Seven Crowns

    Seven Crowns Moderator Staff Supporter Contributor Contest Winner 2022

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2017
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    3,705
    Short answer, no. You don't have to use the second "to."

    You're using an infinitive (to transform) and a bare infinitive (challenge) in a compound. That's legal. You can tell "challenge" is a bare infinitive and not just a verb because it's always singular. L@@K . . .

    She challenges.
    They challenge.
    I challenge.
    It challenges.​

    "Challenge" is singular or plural there depending on the subject. It's just a verb. But in yours, no matter what the subject is, "challenge" does not change. Infinitives are always singular.

    She tried to . . . . and challenge . . .
    They tried to . . . . and challenge . . .
    I tried to . . . . and challenge . . .
    It tried to . . . . and challenge . . .
    So even though you dropped "to," it is still an infinitive. You are using a parallel structure that is properly balanced. Good job! ;)
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2017
  3. WritersBlockParty

    WritersBlockParty New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2017
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    2
    Thanks. I liked your response a lot. At least in this moment, I feel like I understand :)
     
  4. OurJud

    OurJud Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    9,502
    Likes Received:
    9,758
    Location:
    England
    I wish I did. I knew the second 'to' was redundant (which is good enough, I suppose) but @Seven Crowns explanation might as well have been written in hieroglyphics.

    I'm completely blind to written explanations - I'm sure it's some kind of dyslexia.
     
  5. NiallRoach

    NiallRoach Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2015
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    586
    Location:
    The middle of the UK
    I'm with Seven Crowns here, but I'll throw my own explanation in the ring for the sake of it.

    "She tried to transform the fast-food industry and challenge some of the most fundamental assumptions about those who work in it."
    Makes perfect sense.
    "She tried to transform the fast-food industry and [to?] challenge some of the most fundamental assumptions about those who work in it."
    Also makes perfect sense.

    Both are dependent on the "she tried to". Since they're both using the one "to", there's no need for a second.
     
  6. Mrs.Smith

    Mrs.Smith Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2017
    Messages:
    49
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Coastal Georgia
    When in doubt, read it aloud and see what sounds most natural.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice