Tags:
  1. Derivi Dave

    Derivi Dave New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Duluth

    The Harvard Comma

    Discussion in 'Word Mechanics' started by Derivi Dave, Aug 3, 2010.

    When listing three items in a series, what is the protocol on the Harvard comma?

    The mountain road was rigid, rocky and rolling.
    The mountain road was rigid, rocky, and rolling.

    In band, I played a song called "Hope, Honor and Glory".
    In band, I played a song called "Hope, Honor, and Glory".

    Is the Harvard comma the third comma you place in?
    Or is it the process of omitting the third comma, as it is deemed useless?

    Signed, clueless.
     
  2. Fedora

    Fedora Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    24
    The Serial/Oxford/Harvard comma is the last comma in a list, before the conjunction. It's never grammatically incorrect, so use it whenever possible. It usually makes your list easier to read. Some will tell you that it's improper to use in newspapers and online articles, but in that case it comes down to personal preference.
     
  3. arron89

    arron89 Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2008
    Messages:
    2,442
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Auckland
    In the words of Ezra Koenig, who gives a f/ck about an Oxford Comma?
     
  4. Tamsin

    Tamsin New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    154
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Singapore
    i hate that comma.
     
  5. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    I think whether you use it or not can make a subtle difference in meaning. I dislike it when people leave it out, unless I get the sense they did so to try to achieve a different meaning than if they had included it.
     
  6. Cogito

    Cogito Former Mod, Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    36,161
    Likes Received:
    2,827
    Location:
    Massachusetts, USA
    I prefer to leave it in, as it removes any ambiguity that may arise as to whether the final two items are really intended to be separate or paired:

    Without the Harvard comma, you could interpret the last item as either combined or separate salt and pepper shakers.

    Not all cases are this ambiguous, but rather than analyze each case, it's easier to disambiguate it with the Harvard comma.

    Besides, as a software developer, it appeals to my sense of consistency and order. :)
     
  7. JessaNova

    JessaNova New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2010
    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Florida
    I always use that last comma. The sentence just feels incomplete if I don't.
    I do agree that it's about how you read it, so I guess it's just personal preference. :rolleyes:
     
  8. minstrel

    minstrel Leader of the Insquirrelgency Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Messages:
    10,742
    Likes Received:
    9,991
    Location:
    Near Sedro Woolley, Washington
    Cogito makes a good point: there are cases where the meaning would be ambiguous without it.

    I can't be dogmatic about its use. As always, I read my stuff aloud and decide whether it sounds better with the comma or without. That little pause can make or break the rhythm.
     
  9. Wreybies

    Wreybies Thrice Retired Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    23,826
    Likes Received:
    20,815
    Location:
    El Tembloroso Caribe
    I'm with Minstrel. I treat it case by case and cannot profess to having chosen a camp.
     
  10. Manav

    Manav New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Imphal, India
    Wow! Never thought I'll be learning about something called 'Harvard Comma'. It sounds so.... English :)

    Does that name/term also applies to the last comma of a list of phrases? I invariably use comma in such instances. In other instances like the original example (unless meaning is ambiguous as Cog pointed out), I am with Tamsin.
     
  11. zaffy

    zaffy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Buckinghamshire UK
    If the comma stands for 'and' then why have a comma and 'and'?

    If it were written in full it would read like this -
    There was a small table with dozens of shakers: oregano and pepper flakes and powdered parmesan and salt and and pepper.
     
  12. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    13,984
    Likes Received:
    8,557
    Location:
    California, US
    A comma doesn't stand for "and."
     
  13. madhoca

    madhoca Contributor Contributor

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    2,604
    Likes Received:
    151
    Location:
    the shadow of the velvet fortress
    Don’t you mean the Oxford comma? It was originally a feature of the editors at Oxford University Press.

    Although the comma doesn't really stand for 'and', I do remember being taught at school that if there was an 'and' at the end of a simple list, it was unnecessary to put a comma.

    Careful placement of commas can be necessary sometimes to prevent elements running together, like:
    ‘I had peas, fish and chips, and beer for supper’
    NOT ‘I had peas, fish, and chips, and beer for supper’
    OR ‘I had peas, fish and chips and beer for supper’.

    Otherwise, there is no need to bother with such superfluous excrescences. I don’t think that all US punctuation guides recommend it.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice