Beef vs. Chocolate

You could do them at the same time.

Recipe

 

I agree with COG. However, if I were presented with such a choice and my gun was not handy to shoot the person with this offer, I would have to go with Chocolate. 145 lbs of chocolate should last me a pretty long time, so long as I was the only one eating it and didn't have to share.

Then I'd go kill me a deer, since venison is better than beef any day, plus a buck weighs more than I do!

 

Damn it! I forgot to factor in my weight...

 

I'm around maybe 100 pounds, so 100lbs of chocolate I could spread over my lifetime, but 100lbs of beef would get bad. So still chocolate.

 

Chocolate, no doubt, make for so many fun eats.

 

Plus you can put it in/on different stuff, so you'd get more variety than with beef.

 

Chocolate!

I've never been a fan of beef. Pork's more my thing.

 

Those sound tempting, and it's been way too long since I made chili... So in the end I got something from this 'offer' after all.

 

If i had to choose one, it woud have to be chocolate. I say chocolate because if i could only have one, i could only have one in the house (it would be way way tempting to have the other in the house). And the misses needs her chocolate. Chocolate makes her happy, which in return makes me happy, whiuch makes us happy. So chocolate wins

(though i like beef much more, but not having it wouldnt kill me, like having no chocolate would kill the misses, thus kill me in the process).

 

Chocolate, though I do like beef jerky