The Hebraic god was something completely unprecedented

By Xoic · Apr 5, 2023 · ·
Categories:
  1. I don't have a lot to say about this, and I considered just adding it to the Hodgepodge thread, but I thought it should have its own entry.

    As I covered in a few earlier entries:

    The pagan gods were representatives of the forces of nature, both inner and outer. By which I mean the forces of the storm and lightning etc, and the forces of inner human nature (courage, beauty, love, war etc).

    As far as I know those pagan religions were pantheons, a collection of many gods, and didn't really have any strong ruling principle to bind them all together and unify them. Man's psychology and his understanding of nature and his place in it were disunited, scattered and fragmentary. Psychologically we were pulled this way and that by warring or sometimes temporarily allied forces beyond our reckoning.

    But for the first time that I'm aware of, the Hebrew god was the One God To Rule Them All, and in fact absorbed them all into himself. The Many became The One. The fragmented psyche knit itself together and found unity of purpose. Not only in the inidividual, but in a society. The laws of the Ten Commandments laid out the morality that's necessary for a cohesive and well-functioning society, as well as forging unified and purposeful individuals. I'm learning all this from the ongoing Exodus Seminars on Daily Wire.

    It's a strange little word trick, and I used to think it was just silly and coincidental, but God seems to be The Good, and The Devil seems to be The Evil. And that holds true no matter how you dissect it. God is the creator of the highest human principles that allow for us to transcend mere nature (our animal nature) and become truly human. Made in the image of our creator (that voice inside that you could call the conscience, or God, or a messenger of God, or what-have-you). I've come to realize it's more than just the conscience, it's also our traditions. There's an internal and an external manifestation of the unifying/transcendent principle. The pull comes from both within and without.

    It's our higher principles that give life meaning and allow us to transcend the mere animal in us, those impulses that pull us down to the ground. That give a life a greater purpose and unify all our other principles toward one goal. Nested hierarchies of goals, all leading toward a higher purpose rather than toward mere hedonism or gratification of the desires. Principles like property rights (which as I understand it began with the Ten Commandments, and had never been codified anywhere else before), the value of all human life, and the importance of not coveting that which other people have. They seem self-evident, but that's because we live in a society built on them as a foundation. When you break each one down, as they're doing in the videos, they all have long tendrils that reach out into many aspects of our society and are what cause it to be as great as it has been.

    One important aspect I was completely unaware of, and I think most people are, is the meaning behind 'An eye for an eye.' It wasn't permission to feud eternally. It was a limit placed on revenge. It means you can't kill a person if they only took your eye. It also includes the idea that all people are equally valuable in the eyes of the law—the eye of a king is worth no more than the eye of a peasant. Also, there's no record of anyone ever taking someone else's eye or tooth, it was meant entirely metaphorically and understood that way. It was figured up financially for the most part.

    One of the big problems with understanding the Bible is the frustratingly reductive language. These big amazing ideas are presented in such few words that we no longer can grasp them in their full complexity. We need to hear from Bible scholars talking with psychologists explaining what it all means before we can understand it.
    Categories:

Comments

  1. Friedrich Kugelschreiber
    I think Hammurabi's code established property rights.
    1. Not the Territory
      I had never heard of that before. Apparently carved into a 4 tonne slab of diorite. Epic.
    2. Friedrich Kugelschreiber
      It is pretty amazing
      Dave The Great likes this.
  2. Dave The Great
    I would argue the transition from polytheism to monotheism was a regression. It was the assimilation of a union of deity's that operated within their own hierarchy, and were deposed in favor of a chosen peoples, chosen God. An oligarchy, turned into a monarchy. I also don't think that most of what we read from the bible was actually intended to have as much meaning as people think. Seems every generation uncovers some hidden meaning, and translates the text "better".

    Writing in the past must have been a pain staking process, which doesn't seem conducive to much refinement. A final product would have to go through hundreds of physical drafts, written painstakingly on expensive material, with skilled hands. Then, as the organized church got hold of these physical copies, most were likely discarded as heresy, as what seems to have been the case for the Gnostic texts recently uncovered. The texts chosen were not to be altered from then on, to do so was blasphemy. So what's left to do but to infer meaning.

    What you're reading is a heavily curated compilation of texts from multiple sources, joined together, and dissected by every generations learned men, with nothing better to do than to find meaning in it to fit whatever narrative they want it to fit. The original authors being sun baked primates wiping their asses with whatever they used to wipe their ass, if anything. In reality it's a pile of junk that served to sedate the masses and stabilize feudal Europe under the rule of divine monarchs. Predating that, all previous attempts aimed for the same...but at least their Gods were interesting. The Christian God is underdeveloped as a character....a Gary Stu, whose master plan was left out by the author, and who is worse than George R.R. Martin at finishing the story. The Christian God is quite the gardener...

    But Dave! Life is hard, and faith gave hope! Surely the alternative would of been worse. A...Godless world! Well buttercup, there could never be a Godless world...not while Dave the fucking Great is alive. Within a decade by marble busts would be all over the realm. My deeds would be immortalized in stone...and Ghengis Khan would envy the virility in which my seed was spread. Bow before me! Bow before your GOD KING! AHAHAHAHAHAHA.....Perhaps we should stick with Christianity.
    1. Friedrich Kugelschreiber
      every text written before the invention of typewriters and word processors should lack sophistication by this logic
      Dave The Great likes this.
    2. Dave The Great
      Definitely of lower quality compared to what could have been, I would say. And by my logic, the burning of the library of Alexandria doesn't sting so much either, so that's a plus to agreeing with me. Just unsophisticated garbage that was lost.

      The original comment and this one was a mix of rambling and satire. I wouldn't stand behind it, and I certainly wouldn't die defending it...but I can't resist throwing a stone in its defense.
  3. Xoic
    It's easy enough to just make up your own ideas about things like Bible stories and traditions that shaped the course of human civilization. Everybody and their sixteen uncles has done that, and most of it is gibberish not worth the time it takes to read. What we have with the Exodus seminar is a group of Bible scholars of different faiths, some Jewish and others not, presided over by a clinical psychologist who seems to have an uncanny knack for discovering the deep psychological truths contained in these stories, and he's been studying the Bible for many years and bringing to bear all his own knowedge of psychology as well as that of Jung and other great thinkers of the past who subjected it to similar treatment.

    What I write in here about it is just some of the 'tip of the iceberg' ideas that I want to remember or develop a little bit before they slip away into the memory hole. My little post above was just a distillation of a small part of a two hour presentation that went way deeper than can be gleaned from just reading my post. But Peterson is interested in the Bible partly as psychology, partly anthropology, and part many other things, all of which were in the very early process of being discovered in those Old Testament days and then tested through deep time by being codified as law and ritual that formed the basis of the civilization that was foundational in many ways to our own.

    And as I've said a few other times in here, often the ideas revealed through the prophets have the qualities of dreams. They're mysterious, profound, and often difficult to understand at the time, and must be put into practice through methods like ritual or law before we can begin to understand them. Or in the case of dreams we often need to write them down and ponder them for some time at great depth before we can begin to unravel what they mean. A shallow analysis reveals shallow and often pointless meaning that isn't meaning at all. As Dr. Peterson has said many times, a civilization has many stories at different levels of profoundness, and the religious stories are the most profound ones that have withstood the test of millennia. The ones that, when adopted, formed the basis of the civilization itself.

    It seems clear to me that the process of unraveling and coming to understand these profound ideas is still ongoing. In the beginning we had no way to understand them except to turn them into ritual and practice them for centuries or millennia, and gradually learn the truth by living it. This was true about sacrifice—the idea came to our ancestors and at first they had to act it out by actually making sacrifices, in some cases of living people. And as time went on we became able to abstract out the idea at the core of sacrifice—that if we're willing to give up something valuable now, it can bring dividends in the future. For instance by working hard rather than just relaxing or living for nothing but hedonism in the pleasure of the moment. We couldn't understand that concept in its fullness at first, it had to be practiced as ritual for many centuries before we developed the concept into something that wasn't purely physical in nature.

    And this is the way the rest of it works too. Acheiving psychological and social unity is not a step backwards. But there's no need for me to argue with every stray post that pops up in here. My purpose with these posts isn't to try to convince anybody of anything, it's largely just to get my own thoughts down, partly as I said so I can remember them, and partly to help me work through them in this long, ongoing exegesis.

    As a civilization we've reached a point of unprecedented understanding of the human mind. We now know about the unconscious, something that eluded our grasp until a little over a century ago. This allows us to understand both dreams and Bible stories in a much deeper way than ever before. What once could only be expressed in religious terms can now be seen in a more comprehensive light, though of course it must be unravelled carefully, so as not to just impose our own ideas of the moment onto it. We do that, of course, but in time we can see the mistakes and hopefully correct them and get closer to understanding these great riddles at the heart of our culture and our very being. Profound dreams can keep revealing new levels of meaning over years, over a lifetime in fact, and the most profound, the ones that affect entire societies, can keep revealing more meaning for millennia if studied with proper care and attention.
To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice