I hope this is the best place to put this, but if it's not, feel free to move it. : ) Anyway, I was reading some criticism about Isaac Asimov, and this stood out for me: I guess I'd just like to know if you agree with that statement, and if it isn't, necessarily, a bad thing? I actually quite like stories where there's no "action" or indepth description. I'm not sure why this is exactly, I guess I enjoy the freedom to imagine so much more than strict descriptions. Anyway, I figured I'd ask what you thought (about this / Asimov in general).