1st off i know its "best" to start off with a action that keeps them reading but form what i can come up with they all are chicle and while yes a skilled writer could make them more then that I do not call my self a skilled writer (nor do any of you i am sure) So is it really "best" to if your a beginner when what ever you put will be chicle? would it be better to start at a more boring but more original part? (while nothing is orignal of couse it would be less cliche) And i know someone is going to post a "skilled writer can make chicle's good, I am not said writer therefore i can not and saying it dose no good Could i become one? yes sure years form now not here in this time so i need advice for now 2nd There seems to be a certin "rule" of starting with action then bulid up to the middle where things get worse then have the cilmex while true this works i find it greatly a bad idea as any other "rules" like that are looked down on them so why have that one? 3rd i head pepole say good writer but how dose one become good? sure one can write but writing is not necseay skill, its luck that your book gets to the right pepole who like said wriitng, after all even if you write "beutifuly" some will call it brabgae is it really a skill? as picking certin words dose not gantie someone will like it in fact the opsite, with a few exceptions the more big words the worse it is so less is more and yet writers seem to have to know more words very confsuing but in the instreast of im thinking to hard what makes a good writer?