1. Published on Amazon? If you have a book, e-book, or audiobook available on Amazon.com, we'll promote it on WritingForums.org for free. Simply add your book to our Member Publications section. Add your book here or read the full announcement.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  1. U.G. Ridley

    U.G. Ridley I'm a wizard, Hagrid Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    Norway

    Lying in third-person limited

    Discussion in 'General Writing' started by U.G. Ridley, Jul 4, 2016.

    I am writing a book about a woman who has been in abusive relationships all her life, so as you can guess, her logic isn't always the most sound. I want this logic to come across to the reader, but I've heard that when you do that in third-person limited, you can't have the actual narrator explain things using this logic. Like you can't write something like "She had probably just been ungrateful," in response to her getting punched by her abusive husband for no good reason. Instead, you have to write it as, for example, a thought she has. "I must have been ungrateful, she thought."

    I guess this has something to do with the whole "untrustworthy narrator" that I've heard about, which is something I've heard you are only supposed to do in first-person.

    So, can my third-person narrator not say things that, in one way or another, isn't true? Can't he lie, even if it reflects the thoughts and personality of the character that the perspective is coming from?
     
  2. BayView

    BayView Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Messages:
    6,493
    Likes Received:
    6,052
    I think you should have your narrator tell the truth as your narrator sees it. You don't want lies, no, but I think it's fine to have your character's biases come through, for sure.
     
  3. U.G. Ridley

    U.G. Ridley I'm a wizard, Hagrid Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    Norway
    Ok, good. Cause the way it was described to me was that you can't have weird logics and opinions come through in third-person unless you have it be a thought directly from the character. Would have made writing my book such a pain:rofl:
     
  4. sahlmi

    sahlmi Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2016
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    65
    I believe the 'describer' was very mislead. Of course you can have weird logics and opinions in 3rd limited and it's expected. It doesn't have to be an italicized direct thought unless that's your style or for stress.

    Something like, "She had probably just been ungrateful" is perfect fine--assuming this is the mc's pov.
    ...unless I'm completely misunderstanding your question. Are you thinking of omniscient maybe?
     
  5. U.G. Ridley

    U.G. Ridley I'm a wizard, Hagrid Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    Norway
    No, you aren't misunderstanding. The book is third-limited from the pov of an abused woman. I was always used to having my third-person limited style being very close to the actual character personality, until, again, someone mentioned that doing that is only acceptable in first-person, which kind of confused me. So it seems they were just misled and were very confidently telling me something that was very wrong, haha.
     
  6. Steerpike

    Steerpike Felis amatus Supporter Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    11,493
    Likes Received:
    5,652
    Location:
    California, US
    Yes, you were misled. Not only is what you want to do fine, it's common.
     
    U.G. Ridley likes this.
  7. Elven Candy

    Elven Candy Contributing Member Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2016
    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    282
    A limited third person book is like a first person book that's had a pronoun change. The reader's in that character's head, so everything the reader learns is automatically filtered through the character. So, depending on the surrounding text, you could just say:

    She must have been ungrateful.

    I write a lot of my character's thoughts like this, where it's written in the third person and without italics or saying, "she thought," and my alpha readers are never, ever confused. The only times I feel the need to italicize thoughts and put them into first person is when I want a little extra punch, such as if the character's just had an epiphany.
     
  8. Commandante Lemming

    Commandante Lemming Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    May 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,305
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    I wouldnt say you can't do that. I write a really close third person and my characters' thoughts leak into the narrative voice all the time - I have a sequence I'm working on right now where the POV character's thoughts are so clouded by her maternal feelings toward her best friend that she doesn't realize that the friend is slowly planning to sabotage her career and ruin her life. So you can do it, you just have to commit to that kind of voice.
     
  9. Commandante Lemming

    Commandante Lemming Contributing Member Contributor

    Joined:
    May 8, 2014
    Messages:
    1,305
    Likes Received:
    1,049
    Yeah. Same here. I've gotten a few comments that my third person is so close that it's a bit jarring to start with, but those people usually really like the voice when they adjust.
     

Share This Page