Porn v. Abortion Debate

Now that I have your attention....

Hey, folks! The Resource center is going woefully underutilized, and after such a large voting margin in Daniel's poll concerning adding it. I think a good part of the reason is that much of what the Resource area is meant for was once considered spam. I've had two threads in as many days reported to me as spam that are, in fact, perfectly appropriate for the Resource area. So long as the content is writing related, the fact that there is a for profit aspect does not make it automatically taboo. I'm sure there are members here in the forum who are aware of retreats, classes, courses, writing software and other such things for which there may be a fee that they would like to make known to others. The Resource area is the place for that.

Apologies to those who were really looking forward to porn and abortion hashing it out.

Wrey

 

Duly noted!

Dang, knew it was too good to be true!

 

you sly perro, you!

can't see how porn versus abortion makes any sensse, or can be debated, though... ;-)

 

Thank God, I hovered - not that I was looking for either debate - but I thought you flipped your wig, Wreybies. Lol.

I'll check out the center - trouble is I click on what's new and if nothing comes up in the list sometimes the tabs go
unnoticed.

 

Maybe: Does porn lead to more abortions or fewer?

 

Well played, Wreybies. Well played.

 

Fraud! Point noted.

 

Haven't they brought a law into California that says all male porn stars must wear condoms? In theory condoms should equal fewer pregnancies and by pro-rata fewer abortions but apparently the sight of such rubbers is leading to fewer sales so the porn industry is moving out of Ca in order to go bare again. And what does bare mean? Possibly more of the same. I really don't know where I'm going with this, I am just picturing @Wreybies slapping his forehead thinking, these idiots will turn anything into a stupid argument. Well Wrey me ould pal, If you can play with us with thread titles, we can play with you with content

 

I thought we were going to debate which one should be aired on network television

 

*shrug*

If thread titles somehow allowed pictures, I would have put boobies. Just trying to get some action in that Resource area.

 

I agree. This thread needs boobies:

 

Lol, man. They're so cute, though!

 

They're fairly big ones too. Are they real?

 

Blue-footed boobies are a real species, as are red-footed boobies. (They look the same, just have red feet.)

 

I know. It was just my attempt at humor

 

I get it now! It took me a while.

 

Oh it was good enough. Not for a guffaw, but for a tiny titter.

 

Synonyms!

Here are some more boobies:


They're adorable. I want one as a pet.

 

Haha!

 

How come every picture of boobies is a pair?

 

This is why I love ya, Wrey. Your sense of humor is wondertasticful.

 

How did this get from the resource center to an animal species called boobies?

 

I blame Canada. Seems like everything's gone wrong since Canada came along.

 

@Steerpike: Nah. Canada's too sweet and innocent to do such a thing.

 

yeah, but speaking of 'boobies' they sure do have a mayor problem at the moment!