Series or Standalone?

Discussion in 'Traditional Publishing' started by Raki, Jan 23, 2011.

  1. Tesgah

    Tesgah Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Well, I would never end a book in the middle of a battle or so just for the sake of having a cliffhanger. I know that the first book has to have some sort of build up towards an exciting/interesting ending, even though it is intended that the main characters real quest is not yet over.

    Would you say that Eragon is an example of a first book in a series that would work well alone, or is in not enough of a completed story arc? It does leave a lot of unanswered questions for a single book, yet the ending does finish the immidiate threats etc.
     
  2. Youniquee

    Youniquee (◡‿◡✿) Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    729
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Under your bed.
    What about if the first book ends with the characters about go on their quest?
    Or a character dying?
     
  3. Tesgah

    Tesgah Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Oslo, Norway
    Both can be standalones I guess. What happens in between the beginning and the ending is what counts though. A book might build up to a death, and end with it, or end with them deciding that they will travel. What it depends on, however, is how many questions and subplots there are which are not answered. How much more the reader would expect to be told, I guess.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice