The future of Egypt.

Justin Ladobruk · Jul 7, 2013

I was unsure of what was going to happen next in Egypt, but I think Israeli commentator Caroline Glick is right (can't post URL yet, feel free to Google her).

On Wednesday, Egypt had its second revolution in as many years. And there is no telling how many more revolutions it will have in the coming months, or years. This is the case not only in Egypt, but throughout the Islamic world.

The American foreign policy establishment's rush to romanticize as the Arab Spring the political instability that engulfed the Arab world following the self-immolation of a Tunisian peddler in December 2010 was perhaps the greatest demonstration ever given of the members of that establishment's utter cluelessness about the nature of Arab politics and society. Their enthusiastic embrace of protesters who have now brought down President Mohamed Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood regime indicates that it takes more than a complete repudiation of their core assumptions to convince them to abandon them.

US reporters and commentators today portray this week's protests as the restoration of the Egyptian revolution. That revolution, they remain convinced, was poised to replace long-time Egyptian leader and US-ally Hosni Mubarak with a liberal democratic government led by people who used Facebook and Twitter.

Subsequently, we were told, that revolution was hijacked by the Muslim Brotherhood. But now that Morsi and his government have been overthrown, the Facebook revolution is back on track.

And again, they are wrong.

As was the case in 2011, the voices of liberal democracy in Egypt are so few and far between that they have no chance whatsoever of gaining power, today or for the foreseeable future. At this point it is hard to know what the balance of power is between the Islamists who won 74 percent of the vote in the 2011 parliamentary elections and their opponents. But it is clear that their opponents are not liberal democrats. They are a mix of neo-Nasserist fascists, communists and other not particularly palatable groups.

None of them share Western conceptions of freedom and limited government. None of them are particularly pro-American. None of them like Jews. And none of them support maintaining Egypt's cold peace with Israel.

Egypt's greatest modern leader was Gamal Abdel Nasser. By many accounts the most common political view of the anti-Muslim Brotherhood protesters is neo-Nasserist fascism.

Nasser was an enemy of the West. He led Egypt into the Soviet camp in the 1950s. As the co-founder of the Non-Aligned Movement, he also led much of the Third World into the Soviet camp. Nasser did no less damage to the US in his time than al-Qaida and its allies have done in recent years.

Certainly, from Israel's perspective, Nasser was no better than Hamas or al-Qaida or their parent Muslim Brotherhood movement. Like the Islamic fanatics, Nasser sought the destruction of Israel and the annihilation of the Jews.

Whether the fascists will take charge or not is impossible to know. So, too, the role of the Egyptian military in the future of Egypt is unknowable. The same military that overthrew Morsi on Wednesday stood by as he earlier sought to strip its powers, sacked its leaders and took steps to transform it into a subsidiary of the Muslim Brotherhood.

There are only three things that are knowable about the future of Egypt. First it will be poor. Egypt is a failed state. It cannot feed its people. It has failed to educate its people. It has no private sector to speak of. It has no foreign investment.

Second, Egypt will be politically unstable.

Mubarak was able to maintain power for 29 years because he ran a police state that the people feared. That fear was dissipated in 2011. This absence of fear will bring Egyptians to the street to topple any government they feel is failing to deliver on its promises - as they did this week.

Given Egypt's dire economic plight, it is impossible to see how any government will be able to deliver on any promises - large or small - that its politicians will make during electoral campaigns.

And so government after government will share the fates of Mubarak and Morsi.

Beyond economic deprivation, today tens of millions of Egyptians feel they were unlawfully and unjustly ousted from power on Wednesday.

The Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists won big in elections hailed as free by the West. They have millions of supporters who are just as fanatical today as they were last week. They will not go gently into that good night.

Finally, given the utter irrelevance of liberal democratic forces in Egypt today, it is clear enough that whoever is able to rise to power in the coming years will be anti-American, anti- Israel and anti-democratic, (in the liberal democratic sense of the word). They might be nicer to the Copts than the Muslim Brotherhood has been. But they won't be more pro-Western.

They may be more cautious in asserting or implementing their ideology in their foreign policy than the Muslim Brotherhood. But that won't necessarily make them more supportive of American interests or to the endurance of Egypt's formal treaty of peace with Israel.

And this is not the case only in Egypt. It is the case in every Arab state that is now or will soon be suffering from instability that has caused coups, Islamic takeovers, civil wars, mass protests and political insecurity in country after country. Not all of them are broke. But then again, none of them have the same strong sense of national identity that Egyptians share.

Now that we understand what we are likely to see in the coming months and years, and what we are seeing today, we must consider how the West should respond to these events. To do so, we need to consider how various parties responded to the events of the past two-and-ahalf years.

Wednesday's overthrow of the Muslim Brotherhood government is a total repudiation of the US strategy of viewing the unrest in Egypt - and throughout the Arab world - as a struggle between the good guys and the bad guys.

Within a week of the start of the protests in Tahrir Square on January 25, 2011, Americans from both sides of the political divide united around the call for Mubarak's swift overthrow.

A few days later, President Barack Obama joined the chorus of Democrats and Republicans, and called for Mubarak to leave office, immediately. Everyone from Sen. John McCain to Samantha Power was certain that despite the fact that Mubarak was a loyal ally of the US, America would be better served by supporting the rise of the Facebook revolutionaries who used Twitter and held placards depicting Mubarak as a Jew.

Everyone was certain that the Muslim Brotherhood would stay true to its word and keep out of politics.

Two days after Mubarak was forced from office, Peter Beinart wrote a column titled "America's Proud Egypt Moment," where he congratulated the neo-conservatives and the liberals and Obama for scorning American interests and siding with the protesters who opposed all of Mubarak's pro-American policies.

Beinart wrote exultantly, "Hosni Mubarak's regime was the foundation stone - along with Israel and Saudi Arabia - of American power in the Middle East. It tortured suspected al- Qaida terrorists for us, pressured the Palestinians for us, and did its best to contain Iran.

And it sat atop a population eager - secular and Islamist alike - not only to reverse those policies, but to rid the Middle East of American power. And yet we cast our lot with that population, not their ruler."

Beinart also congratulated the neo-conservatives for parting ways with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu who counseled caution, and so proved they do not suffer from dual loyalty.

That hated, reviled Israeli strategy, (which was not Netanyahu's alone, but shared by Israelis from across the political spectrum in a rare demonstration of unanimity), was proven correct by events of the past week and indeed by events of the past two-and-a-half years.

Israelis watched in shock and horror as their American friends followed the Pied Piper of the phony Arab Spring over the policy cliff. Mubarak was a dictator. But his opponents were no Alexander Dubceks. There was no reason to throw away 30 years of stability before figuring out a way to ride the tiger that would follow it.

Certainly there was no reason to actively support Mubarak's overthrow.

Shortly after Mubarak was overthrown, the Obama administration began actively supporting the Muslim Brotherhood.

The Muslim Brotherhood believed that the way to gain and then consolidate power was to hold elections as quickly as possible. Others wanted to wait until a constitutional convention convened and a new blueprint for Egyptian governance was written. But the Muslim Brotherhood would have none of it. And Obama supported it.

Five months after elections of questionable pedigree catapulted Morsi to power, Obama was silent when in December 2012 Morsi arrogated dictatorial powers and pushed through a Muslim Brotherhood constitution.

Obama ignored Congress three times and maintained full funding of Egypt despite the fact that the Morsi government had abandoned its democratic and pluralistic protestations.

He was silent over the past year as the demonstrators assembled to oppose Morsi's power grabs. He was unmoved as churches were torched and Christians were massacred. He was silent as Morsi courted Iran.

US Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson and Obama remained the Muslim Brotherhood's greatest champions as the forces began to gather ahead of this week's mass protests. Patterson met with the Coptic pope and told him to keep the Coptic Christians out of the protests.

Obama, so quick to call for Mubarak to step down, called for the protesters to exercise restraint this time around and then ignored them during his vacation in Africa.

The first time Obama threatened to curtail US funding of the Egyptian military was Wednesday night, after the military ignored American warnings and entreaties, and deposed Morsi and his government.

This week's events showed how the US's strategy in Egypt has harmed America.

In 2011, the military acted to force Mubarak from power only after Obama called for it to do so. This week, the military overthrew Morsi and began rounding up his supporters in defiance of the White House.

Secretary of State John Kerry was the personification of the incredible shrinkage of America this week as he maintained his obsessive focus on getting Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians.

In a Middle East engulfed by civil war, revolution and chronic instability, Israel is the only country at peace. The image of Kerry extolling his success in "narrowing the gaps" between Israel and the Palestinians before he boarded his airplane at Ben-Gurion Airport, as millions assembled to bring down the government of Egypt, is the image of a small, irrelevant America.

And as the anti-American posters in Tahrir Square this week showed, America's self-induced smallness is a tragedy that will harm the region and endanger the US.

As far as Israel is concerned, all we can do is continue what we have been doing, and hope that at some point, the Americans will embrace our sound strategy.
Click to expand...

Egypt will go through revolution after revolution until it collapses into civil war. There simply aren't enough liberals to make any serious changes anywhere in the Muslim-Arab world.

JJ_Maxx · Jul 7, 2013

Well, what can you do? If the people don't want peace then let them all kill each other and we'll talk when the smoke clears.

Pull the money, pull the troops, secure our borders. Hoorah for isolationism!

Justin Ladobruk · Jul 7, 2013

JJ_Maxx said: ↑

Well, what can you do? If the people don't want peace then let them all kill each other and we'll talk when the smoke clears.

Pull the money, pull the troops, secure our borders. Hoorah for isolationism!
Click to expand...

UAE and Saudi Arabia have pledged their cash if America pulls it's $2 billion per year out. No reason to stick around.

Oswiecenie · Jul 7, 2013

jmhoffer said: ↑

There simply aren't enough liberals to make any serious changes anywhere in the Muslim-Arab world.
Click to expand...

What Egypt needs is another great man like Gamal Abdel Nasser, not some wacky, Western-style liberals.

erebh · Jul 7, 2013

jmhoffer said: ↑

There simply aren't enough liberals to make any serious changes anywhere in the Muslim-Arab world.
Click to expand...

I'm sure Netanyahu would know what to do with all the Muslim world

JJ_Maxx said: ↑

Well, what can you do? If the people don't want peace then let them all kill each other and we'll talk when the smoke clears.

Pull the money, pull the troops, secure our borders. Hoorah for isolationism!
Click to expand...

I agree, leave them all to their own devices - have nothing to do with them - nothing! The only problem for America is Israel, and of course the Suez Canal. The only reason the US give Egypt so much money (second only to Israel in term of charitable hand outs) is because they need the river to get their warships in and the oil out.

jmhoffer said: ↑

UAE and Saudi Arabia have pledged their cash if America pulls it's $2 billion per year out.
Click to expand...

As I said already - Saudi need to et their oil out as much as we need to buy it.

Justin Ladobruk · Jul 7, 2013

Oswiecenie said: ↑

What Egypt needs is another great man like Gamal Abdel Nasser, not some wacky, Western-style liberals.
Click to expand...

I'd like to see Mubarak returned to power, but that's about as likely as Ariel Sharon coming back.

Something to remember is that Nasser was a fascist. That kind of strength will involve a slaughter to obtain.

madhoca · Jul 9, 2013

It is not a revolution, it is just ongoing conflict. When is the US going to realise that engineering "democracy" means the end of progress and economic stability, since it opens up government to the mob, the most dangerously backward sections of that society? I don't care if the man heading them appears to moderate his language, he panders to their worst prejudices and will wreck the country. The same goes for Turkey, although fortunately people are better educated. Education is in fact the only hope for a decent future and rather than isolate them we should do all we can to engage with them.

erebh · Jul 9, 2013

madhoca said: ↑

It is not a revolution, it is just ongoing conflict. When is the US going to realise that engineering "democracy" means the end of progress and economic stability, since it opens up government to the mob, the most dangerously backward sections of that society? I don't care if the man heading them appears to moderate his language, he panders to their worst prejudices and will wreck the country. The same goes for Turkey, although fortunately people are better educated. Education is in fact the only hope for a decent future and rather than isolate them we should do all we can to engage with them.
Click to expand...

On-going conflict indeed, engineered by the US/EU/Saudis for control of the Suez Canal.

It's a big thing to say Turkish people are better educated then Egyptian, I wouldn't know but you have to look at the educators and what they are teaching, At least in Turkey, your curriculum isn't dictated by foreign superpowers, at least I hope.

Michael O · Jul 9, 2013

jmhoffer said: ↑

Egypt will go through revolution after revolution until it collapses into civil war. There simply aren't enough liberals to make any serious changes anywhere in the Muslim-Arab world.
Click to expand...

You just summed up about 2k years of history there. What was that singer's name of The Talking Heads? Sang "Same As It Ever Was."

I'm reading The Crucible of Christianity and the author made an interesting point. Had Alexander the Great lived the average life span of his generals, the entire region would have evolved differently. He based this on Alexander method of conquering then having soldiers marry into the population.

Funny choice of word...Liberals. I tend to classify them as civilized humans and think women hold the key. It's like Golda Meir said, "As long as they hate us more than they love their children, there will not be peace in the Mid-East." Now that can be expanded to include the rest of the civilized world.

erebh · Jul 10, 2013

So while Adli Mansour imprisoned all of the Muslim Brotherhood, he has now recanted and offered them Ministerial posts in his new govt, wouldn't have anything to do with the $10 billion dollar donations from Saudi, the UAE and US would it? All beliefs seem to go out the window as soon as the cheque book appears. Meanwhile Turkey are blaming the Jews on their recent conspiracy http://www.france24.com/en/20130702-foreign-powers-jewish-diaspora-behind-turkish-unrest-deputy-pm-atalay

Michael O · Jul 10, 2013

Oswiecenie said: ↑

What Egypt needs is another great man like Gamal Abdel Nasser, not some wacky, Western-style liberals.
Click to expand...

That's right! I vote for less wacky!

And the freedom to drink cold beer! Eat smoked ham sandwiches in peace! Play cards and gamble! Watch biological work of arts sizzle brown on Red Sea beaches in dental floss bikinis...Mmgh! Might even have to have a dubious doobie clause in there someplace. Could I write a constitution or what?

Crap! Every minute I spend here is less time I spend editing. This place is more addictive than the heroin I just kicked. Wonder if I could sue Daniel for making me waste time?

Log in or Sign up

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

The future of Egypt.

JJ_Maxx Banned

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

Oswiecenie Active Member

erebh Banned Contributor

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

madhoca Contributor Contributor

erebh Banned Contributor

Michael O Member

erebh Banned Contributor

Michael O Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

The future of Egypt.

JJ_Maxx Banned

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

Oswiecenie Active Member

erebh Banned Contributor

Justin Ladobruk Active Member

madhoca Contributor Contributor

erebh Banned Contributor

Michael O Member

erebh Banned Contributor

Michael O Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches