Hello, I just wanted to get some opinions on writing trilogies and how you think it should be done. For some, trilogies where Book 1 leaves many questions unanswered to be followed up in Book 2 is great (an incentive to keep reading and find out what happens in Book 2 and so on...), but for others it doesn't work - trilogies need to be able to stand as a satisfying standalone. What would you think of a trilogy consisting of completely independent stories? How do you think that would work? The main question is though, how do you think trilogies are best done?